A study to compare combination of Foley’s catheter with misoprostol versus mifepristone with misoprostol in second trimester abortion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261605Keywords:
Second trimester abortion, Foley’s catheter, MisoprostolAbstract
Background: Second trimester abortion, which is the interruption of pregnancy between 13 and 28 weeks of gestation, accounts for roughly 10–15% of all induced abortions worldwide. Although second trimester procedures are less common than first trimester ones, they account for an unequal share of abortion-related complications and maternal health issues due to the later gestational age at which they are performed. Typical reasons for second trimester abortions include fetal abnormalities found during standard ultrasounds, intrauterine fetal death, and maternal health concerns like severe hypertension, heart disease, or mental health disorders.
Methods: Study was carried out at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, R.N.T. Medical College, Udaipur (Rajasthan). Study period: April 2024 to March 2025.
Results: Findings indicate that a method-wise comparison of two protocols for second trimester abortion—Foley catheter with Misoprostol and Mifepristone with Misoprostol, involving 33 participants each. The average interval from induction to abortion was notably reduced in the Foley group (11.27±3.36 hours) in contrast to the Mifepristone group (29.75±3.92 hours), with a p-value of 0.0, reflecting strong statistical significance. The median induction time was 10.4 hours for Foley and 29.1 hours for Mifepristone, with the overall induction time varying from 5.1 to 18.2 hours in the Foley group and 24.2 to 37.6 hours in the Mifepristone group.
Conclusions: To conclude, the Foley catheter combined with misoprostol is a quicker and more economical approach, making it especially appropriate for low-resource environments or scenarios that require reduced induction times. Conversely, mifepristone combined with misoprostol offers a more thorough and dependable uterine evacuation, minimizing the requirement for surgical procedures.
References
Abebe M, Mersha A, Degefa N, Molla W, Wudneh A. Magnitude of second-trimester-induced abortion and associated factors among women who received abortion service at public hospitals of Arba Minch and Wolayita Sodo towns, southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;3:969310.
Hern WM. Fetal diagnostic indications for second and third trimester outpatient pregnancy termination. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(5):438-44.
Wasihun Y, Mekonnen T, Asrat AA, Dagne S, Menber Y, Fentahun N. Determinants of Second-Trimester Safe Termination of Pregnancy in Public Health Facilities of Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia: An Unmatched Case-Control Study. Adv Public Health. 2021;2021:6643245.
De Londras F, Cleeve A, Rodriguez MI, Farrell A, Furgalska M, Lavelanet AF. The impact of provider restrictions on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence. Reprod Health. 2022;19:95.
Shrestha S, Dangal G, Ghimire S. Profile of Women receiving Second-trimester Safe Abortion Service at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2022;20(77):51-5.
Swantic V, Hawley D, Zipp C, Lee N, Praditpan P. Second-trimester Abortion. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023;66(4):685-96.
Trevino J, Paul R, King E, Reeves J, Eisenberg D, Madden T. Abortion trends at a single clinic in southern illinois before and after the dobbs v. Jackson women’s health organization decision. Contraception. 2024;139:110611.
Manku H. Comparative study of foley’s catheter and misoprostol versus mifepristone and misoprostol in induction of midtrimester abortions: a retrospective study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2024;12(12):4533-40.
Fonseca MN, Sah V. Comparative study between sequential use of Foley catheter with vaginal misoprostol versus sequential use of oral mifepristone with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(11):4545-50.
Sangeeta, Prajwala A. A randomized study to compare the efficacy of combined use of intra-cervical Foley followed by vaginal misoprostol with misoprostol alone in termination of second trimester pregnancy. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;3(1):209-11.
Kusuman VN, Khan NBA, Sruthi V, Anitha R, Shiny K, Divya S. Comparison of effectiveness of Foley catheter-misoprostol combination versus misoprostol-Foley-EAS combination in second trimester pregnancy termination. Indian J Clin Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;5(4):5304.
Swathi M, Andallu R, Balasaraswathi M, Suvarna V. A comparative study of second trimester termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol vs misoprostol alone in 50 cases. Eureka Health Sci. 2022;(6):15-22.
Beishen, Sulukhia R, Pkhaladze L, Davidova N, Khomasuridze A. Mifepriston in obstetrics - why not?. Georgian Med News. 2007;(347):11-4.
Vani P, Khan NBA, S VG. Comparison of effectiveness of mifepristone misoprostol combination versus mifepristone Foley EAS (Extra-amniotic instillation of saline) combination in second trimester pregnancy termination. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2023;5(4):530-4.
Sium AF, Teklu H, Reeves M, Tolu LB, Prager S. One-day versus two-day mifepristone-misoprostol interval prior to initiation of misoprostol during late second trimester medication abortion: A cohort study. Contraception. 2024;132:110356.
Manku H. Comparative study of foley’s catheter and misoprostol versus mifepristone and misoprostol in induction of midtrimester abortions: a retrospective study. Int J Res Med Sci. 2024;12(12):4533-40.
Kusuman VN, Khan NBA, Sruthi V, Anitha R, Shiny K, Divya S. Comparison of effectiveness of Foley catheter-misoprostol combination versus misoprostol-Foley-EAS combination in second trimester pregnancy termination. Indian J Clin Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;5(4):5304.
Gupta R, Garg R, Yadav D, Singh U, Kaur P. Efficacy and safety of mifepristone for induction of labor in late intrauterine fetal demise. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynaecol. 2015;15(4):409-11.
Kshetri, Lerma K, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Evaluation of shorter mifepristone to misoprostol intervals for second trimester medical abortion: a retrospective cohort study. Contraception. 2024;102(5):327-31.
Yashmin, Kelekci S, Ertas IE, Ozel M, Sut N, Mollamahmutoglu L, et al. Randomized comparison of second trimester pregnancy termination utilizing saline moistened or dry misoprostol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;276(5):511-6.
El-Refaey H, Templeton A. Induction of abortion in the second trimester by a combination of misoprostol and mifepristone: a randomized comparison between two misoprostol regimens. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(2):475-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
