Effect of oral contraceptive pill on central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in young females

Chetna R. Patel; Vijita K. Shah; Neha D. Patel; Vaibhav M. Panchal; Chirag S. Adwani

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261615

Authors

Chetna R. Patel Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
Vijita K. Shah Department of Pharmacology, Dr. Kiran C. Patel Medical College and Research Institute, Bharuch, Gujarat, India
Neha D. Patel Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
Vaibhav M. Panchal Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
Chirag S. Adwani Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261615

Keywords:

Central corneal thickness, Intraocular pressure, Oral contraceptive pills, Young women

Abstract

Background: The usage of oral contraceptive pills (OCP) consisting of estrogen and progesterone can interfere with central corneal thickness (CCT) results due to hormonal fluctuations. This study assessed the impact of oral contraceptive pill usage on central corneal thickness estimations in healthy young women.

Methods: This prospective study comprised forty women utilizing OCP for contraception (group 1) and forty control subjects utilizing OCP (group 2). All participants revealed no history of systemic or ocular medical conditions. CCT measurements were acquired using an ultrasonic pachymeter, and intraocular pressure (IOP) readings were evaluated with a noncontact tonometer during a patient's hospital visit. Demographic information and body mass index (BMI) scores of participants were documented.

Results: The mean ages were 28.5±6.08 for OCP+ patients (group 1) and 28.3±5.85 for OCP- patients (group 2) (P=0.88). The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) in group 1 was substantially higher than in group 2, with measurements of 575±39.4 μm and 518±28.8 μm, respectively (p=0.001). The average intraocular pressure (IOP) was 15.6±1.52 mmHg in group 1 and 15.1±1.14 mmHg in group 2 (p=0.16). The mean BMI values were 28.5±6.08 kg/m² for group 1 and 28.3±5.85 kg/m² for group 2 (p=0.91).

Conclusions: Our data suggested that CCT values were significantly elevated in patients utilizing OCP. Ophthalmologists must acknowledge the potential for increased CCT in these individuals.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wong AC-M, Wong C-C, Yuen NS-Y, Hui S-P. Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orb scan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye (Lond). 2002;16(6):715-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700211

Ondas O, Keles S. Central corneal thickness in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:1687-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890825

Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013. NCHS Data Brief. 2014;(173):1-8.

Vessey MP, Hannaford P, Mant J, Painter R, Frith P, Chappel D. Oral contraception and eye disease: findings in two large cohort studies. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(5):538-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.82.5.538

Kawase K, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y. Ocular and systemic factors related to intraocular pressure in Japanese adults: the Tajimi study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(9):1175-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.128819

Su DHW, Wong TY, Foster PJ, Tay W-T, Saw S-M, Aung T. Central corneal thickness and its associations with ocular and systemic factors: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(4):709-16.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.013

Westhoff CL, Torgal AH, Mayeda ER, Stanczyk FZ, Lerner JP, Benn EK, et al. Ovarian suppression in normal-weight and obese women during oral contraceptive use: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:275-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e79440

Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z. EMGT Group. Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016

Giuffrè G, Di Rosa L, Fiorino F, Bubella DM, Lodato G. Variations in central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in women. Cornea. 2007;26(2):144-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000244873.08127.3c

Soni PS. Effects of oral contraceptive steroids on the thickness of the human cornea. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57(11):825-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198011000-00008

Stojanov O, Stokić E, Sveljo O, Naumović N. The influence of retrobulbar adipose tissue volume upon intraocular pressure in obesity. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013;70(5):469-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP1305469S

Mori K, Ando F, Nomura H, Sato Y, Shimokata H. Relationship between intraocular pressure and obesity in Japan. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(4):661-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.4.661

Zafra Pérez JJ, Villegas Pérez MP, Canteras Jordana M, Miralles De Imperial J. [ntraocular pressure and prevalence of occult glaucoma in a village of Murcia. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2000;75(3):171-8.

Sen E, Onaran Y, Nalcacioglu-Yuksekkaya P, Elgin U, Ozturk F. Corneal biomechanical parameters during pregnancy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(3):314-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000378

Abramov Y, Borik S, Yahalom C, Fatum M, Avgil G, Brzezinski A, et al. Does postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy affect intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma. 2005;14(4):271-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000169390.17427.b7

Dong S, Si Y, Zhang Y, Zhao G. Risk factors analysis of primary open angle glaucoma in women. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013;49(2):122-5.

Paterson GD, Miller SJ. Hormonal Influence in Simple Glaucoma. A Preliminary Report. Br J Ophthalmol. 1963;47(3):129-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.47.3.129

Kass MA, Sears ML. Hormonal regulation of intraocular pressure. Surv Ophthalmol 1977;22(3):153-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(77)90053-4

Phillips CI, Gore SM. Ocular hypotensive effect of late pregnancy with and without high blood pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69(2):117-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.69.2.117

Efe YK, Ugurbas SC, Alpay A, Ugurbas SH. The course of corneal and intraocular pressure changes during pregnancy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012;47(2):150-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.01.004

Pasquale LR, Kang JH. Female reproductive factors and primary open-angle glaucoma in the Nurses’ Health Study. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(5):633-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.34

Chen SP, Massaro-Giordano G, Pistilli M, Schreiber CA, Bunya VY. Tear osmolarity and dry eye symptoms in women using oral contraception and contact lenses. Cornea. 2013;32(4):423-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182662390

Aggarwal RS, Mishra VV, Aggarwal SV. Oral contraceptive pills: A risk factor for retinal vascular occlusion in in-vitro fertilization patients. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(1):7981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112389

Orlin A, Orlin SE, Makar GA, Bunya VY. Presumed corneal copper deposition and oral contraceptive use. Cornea. 2010;29(4):476-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181b53326