Impact of intensive antenatal monitoring on perinatal outcomes among women with previous perinatal deaths in Nigeria: a prospective cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261461Keywords:
Antenatal monitoring, Fetal growth restriction, Stillbirth, Perinatal mortality, Fetal DopplerAbstract
Background: Stillbirth and perinatal mortality remain major public health challenges in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Nigeria, where rates remain among the highest globally. Women with previous perinatal deaths are at significantly increased risk of recurrence. This study evaluated the impact of an intensive antenatal monitoring protocol on pregnancy outcomes among such high-risk women in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Fetal Medicine Unit of Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex between January 2021 and December 2024. Eighty-one pregnant women with a history of one or more perinatal deaths were recruited. In addition to routine antenatal care, participants received structured monitoring including early risk stratification, low-dose aspirin where indicated, fetal anomaly scanning, uterine artery Doppler, and serial fetal growth and umbilical artery Doppler assessments. Primary outcomes were stillbirth, early neonatal death, and perinatal mortality rates. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, mode of delivery, and detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR).
Results: A total of 84 neonates were delivered. The perinatal mortality rate was 59.5 per 1,000 total births, lower than national estimates. Five perinatal deaths (5.9%) were recorded, comprising four stillbirths and one early neonatal death. Preterm birth occurred in 59.5% of cases, with most being provider-initiated due to hypertensive disorders and FGR. FGR was detected in 4.9% of pregnancies. Caesarean section rate was 69.1%.
Conclusions: Intensive antenatal monitoring among women with previous perinatal deaths was associated with improved perinatal outcomes compared to national averages. Scaling up structured surveillance strategies may contribute significantly to reducing perinatal mortality in high-risk populations in resource-limited settings.
References
United Nations Children’s Fund. Stillbirth. New York: United Nations; 2025. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/stillbirths/#:~:text=Women%20in%20sub%2DSaharan%20Africa,stillbirths%20per%201%2C000%20total%20births. Accessed on 25 March 2026.
United Nations Children Fund. Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: A systematic assessment. New York: UNICEF; 2021. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/resources/global-regional-and-national-estimates-and-trends-in-stillbirths/#:~:text=Stillbirths%20are%20a%20major%20public,the%20under%2Dfive%20mortality%20rate. Accessed on 25 March 2026.
Moyer CA, Dako-Gyeke P, Adanu RM. Facility-based delivery and maternal and early neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: a regional review of the literature. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013;17(3):30-43.
National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria], ICF. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2024. Abuja and Rockville: NPC and ICF. 2024.
Tukur J, Lavin T, Adanikin A, Abdussalam M, Bankole K, Ekott MI, et al. Quality and outcomes of maternal and perinatal care for 76,563 pregnancies reported in a nationwide network of Nigerian referral-level hospitals. eClin Med. 2022;47:101411.
United Nations Children’s Fund, World Health Organization, World Bank Group. A neglected tragedy. The global burden of stillbirth. Geneva: WHO. 2020. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/reports/neglected-tragedy-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020. Accessed on 1 March 2026.
Lamont K, Scott NW, Jones GT, Bhattacharya S. Risk of recurrent stillbirth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350(3):h3080.
Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196-252.
Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331-40.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus (Green-top Guideline No. 31). London: RCOG. 2014.
Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, O’Gorman N, Syngelaki A, De Paco Matallana C, et al. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):613-22.
Chudleigh T, Cohen‐Overbeek TE, for the ISUOG Basic Training Sub‐Committee. How to apply the 20 + 2‐planes method for identification of 65 fetal abnormalities during routine second‐trimester fetal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;66(3):383-96.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum fetal surveillance. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 229. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e177-97.
Goldenberg RL, Saleem S, Pasha O, Harrison MS, Mcclure EM. Reducing stillbirths in low‐income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(2):135-43.
Kuti O, Awowole I, Okunola T. Audit of stillbirths in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;34(3):188.
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017:6.
United Nations. Transforming our World; The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN. 2015. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Accessed on 1 March 2026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
