Stepwise surgical repair of complete perineal tear (OASIS): a 20-year retrospective study of 200 referred cases at a tertiary care centre in Bundelkhand region

Authors

  • Hema J. Shobhane Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shreya Sorout Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262109

Keywords:

Rectal mucosal repair, Obstetric anal sphincter injury, OASIS, Fourth-degree tear, Complete perineal tear, End-to-end sphincter repair

Abstract

Background: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), comprising third- and fourth-degree perineal tears, are severe obstetric complications leading to significant maternal morbidity including fecal incontinence, perineal pain, wound dehiscence, dyspareunia, rectovaginal fistula formation, and psychological distress. This study aimed to evaluate demographic and obstetric characteristics of referred complete perineal tear cases managed at a tertiary care centre and to describe a standardized stepwise surgical repair protocol with functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, from January 2005 to December 2025. A total of 200 referred cases of complete perineal tear were included. Surgical repair was performed after 24 hours of delivery.

Results: Among 200 patients, 50% were aged >25 years and 70% were primigravida. Post-term deliveries accounted for 55% of cases. Birth weight was >3 kg in 50% of cases. Episiotomy was not given in 85% of cases. Saddle anaesthesia was used in 75% patients. Hospital stay was 14 days in 55% of patients.

Conclusions: Complete perineal tears were more frequent among primigravida and post-term deliveries, especially with neonatal birth weight >3 kg. Delayed repair following a standardized stepwise anatomical reconstruction protocol resulted in satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes.

References

Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury. BJOG. 2006;33(2):117-22.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. Green-top Guideline No. 29. London: RCOG; 2015.

Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk. 1999;5(6):193-6.

Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(26):1905-11.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Practice Bulletin. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;198.

Globerman D, Ramirez AC, Larouche M, Neustaedter G, MacMillan A, Ross S, et al. Guideline No. 457: Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024;46(12):102719.

Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, Vrachnis N, Doumouchtsis SK. Diagnosis and treatment of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3261.

Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women. BMJ Open. 2013;120(12):1516-25.

Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Mahmood TA, et al. Impact of operative vaginal delivery on OASIS. BJOG. 2014;121:43-52.

Laine K, Rotvold W, Staff AC. Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable? BJOG. 2013;92(1):94-100.

Jango H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A. Risk factors of recurrent OASIS. BJOG. 2012;119:1640-1648.

Dandolu V, Chatwani A, Harmanli O, Lalwani S, Bhagavath B, Grody MH. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16(4):304-307.

Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Midline episiotomy and severe perineal trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:213-220.

DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of pelvic floor injury. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:293-299.

Snooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature during childbirth. Lancet. 1984;324(8402):546-50.

Starck M, Bohe M, Valentin L. Endoanal ultrasound in assessment of OASIS. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:27-32.

Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter function after childbirth. Br J Surg. 1994;81:463-467.

Hals E, Oian P, Pirhonen J, Gissler M, Hjelle S, Nilsen EB, et al. A multicentre interventional programme to reduce OASIS. BJOG. 2010;116(4):901-8.

Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E, Wilsgaard T, Vonen B, Øian P. Episiotomy characteristics and risk of OASIS. BJOG. 2012;119(9):724-730.

Gurol-Urganci I, Bidwell P, Sevdalis N, Silverton L, van der Meulen J, Thakar R. Impact of OASI Care Bundle. Lancet. 2022;399:2390-2401.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Shobhane, H. J., & Sorout, S. (2026). Stepwise surgical repair of complete perineal tear (OASIS): a 20-year retrospective study of 200 referred cases at a tertiary care centre in Bundelkhand region. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(7), 2596–2601. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262109

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles