DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170379

A comparative study of partogram in normal labour with and without a constant caring companion

Aditi Rajgire, Kiran Borkar, Aniket Rajgire

Abstract


Background: In today's world with the concept of changing childbirth, where there is a 'women centered approach', the idea of a constant caring companion has reemerged. In a busy labour ward patients may deliver safely but it may contribute to patient's dissatisfaction, as they do not feel cared for. The constant caring companion would prove an important asset to the doctor and nurses involved in the management of the women in labour.

Methods: Prospective study carried out in 120 patients meeting inclusion criteria.

Results: Patients with constant caring companion had significant lower percentage (13.3%) of pain level as compared to those without companion. The mean satisfaction score of the patients with ccc was 90.66 whereas the score of the group without ccc was 30.33 which statistically highly significant. 42 of the patients with ccc and 39 patients without ccc opted for known female relative as constant caring companion. All woman in the study group and 97% in the control group would recommend a constant caring companion to the pregnant woman.

Conclusions: Women with a constant caring companion have a more fulfilling and satisfactory experience of the labour process which cannot be said about the women without ccc. Since no negative impact was observed due to the presence of a constant caring companion, this practice may be recommended. The constant caring companion would prove an important asset to the doctor involved in the management of labouring women.


Keywords


CCC- constant caring companion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hicks C, Spurgeon P, Barwell F. School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham B15 277, UK J Adv Nure. 2003;42(6):617-28.

Spurgeon P, Hicks C, Barewell F. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot changing childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care. Midwifery. 2001;17(2):123-32.

Mackey MC, Goodman P, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212-9.

Kennell J1, Klaus M, McGrath S, Robertson S, Hinkley C. Continuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1991;265(17):2197-201.

Zhang J, Bernasko JW, Leybovich E, Fahs M, Hatch MC. Continuous labor support from labor attendant for primiparous women: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(4 Pt 2):739-44.

Susan K et all, Klaus M, McGraths, Robertsons, Hinkley C. JAMA 1991;265(17)2197- 01.

Mackey MC, Goodman P, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212-9

Hodnett ED, Lowe NK, Hannah ME, William AR, Stevens B, Weston JA. JAMA. 2002;288(11):1373-81.