Risk factors for episiotomy among primiparous women in Madagascar: a retrospective case-control study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262075Keywords:
Episiotomy, Madagascar, Obstetrics, Primiparous women, Risk factors, Vaginal deliveryAbstract
Background: Episiotomy remains one of the most frequently performed obstetric procedures worldwide, especially among primiparous women. Despite recommendations promoting restrictive use, the practice remains common in low-resource settings. This study aimed to identify factors associated with episiotomy among primiparous women delivering at the University Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Befelatanana, Madagascar.
Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at the University Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Befelatanana from January 2018 to December 2019. Primiparous women who underwent vaginal delivery were included. Cases were women who received episiotomy and controls were women without episiotomy. Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using Epi Info and Microsoft Excel. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Results: Among 2,903 primiparous women, the prevalence of episiotomy was 34.51%. A total of 855 cases and 1,710 controls were analyzed. Factors significantly associated with episiotomy were maternal age ≥35 years (OR=2.90; 95% CI: 1.89-4.02), uterine height ≥34 cm (OR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.25-1.76), gestational age >42 weeks (OR=4.10; 95% CI: 1.81-20.39), labor duration ≥12 hours (OR=9.03; 95% CI: 7.48-10.89), prolonged second stage of labor, breech presentation (OR=4.04; 95% CI: 1.51-10.80), instrumental delivery, occipito-sacral delivery, and birth weight >3500 g.
Conclusions: Episiotomy prevalence among primiparous women remains high in Madagascar. Restrictive use of episiotomy, improved intrapartum monitoring, and enhanced antenatal preparation may reduce unnecessary procedures and maternal morbidity.
References
Woldegeorgis BZ, Obsa MS, Tolu LB, Bogino EA, Boda TI, Alemu HB. Episiotomy practice and its associated factors in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fronti Medi. 2022;9:905174.
Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(2).
Langer B, Minetti A. Immediate and long-term complications of episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstetr Reproduct Biol. 2006;35:59-67.
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience, 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215. Accessed 01 January 2026.
Pebolo F, Judith A, Kaye D. Prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy practice among primiparous women in Uganda. Int J Pregnancy Child Birth. 2019;5.
Clesse C, Cottenet J, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, Goueslard K, Scheffler M, Sagot P, et al. Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1‑11.
Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, Geerts CC, Prins M, Klomp T, Jonge de A, Van Diem MT, et al. The use of episiotomy in a low‐risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis. Birth issues perinatal care. 2013;40(4):247-55.
Pebolo F, Judith A, Kaye D. Prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy practice among primiparous women in mulago national referral hospital Uganda. Int J Pregnancy Child Birth. 2019;5.
Beucher G, Dreyfus M. Prise en charge du dépassement de terme. Rev Sage-Femme. 1 juill 2008;7(3):118‑29.
Zhang M, Wang M, Zhao X, Ren J, Xiang J, Luo B, et al. Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal childbirth: A retrospective cohort study in Western China. J Evid Based Med. 2018;11(4):233-41.
Räisänen S, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gisler M, Heinonen S. A population-based register study to determine indications for episiotomy in Finland. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115(1):26‑30.
Gebuza G, Kaźmierczak M, Gdaniec A, Mieczkowska E, Gierszewska M, Dombrowska-Pali A, et al. Episiotomy and perineal tear risk factors in a group of 4493 women. Heal Care Women Int. 2018;39(6):663‑83.
Desplanches T, Marchand-Martin L, Szczepanski ED, Ruillier M, Cottenet J, Semama D, et al. Mediolateral episiotomy and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and adverse neonatal outcomes during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women: a propensity-score analysis. BMC Pregn Childb. déc 2022;22(1):1‑10.
Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M, Tremblay A, Pinault JJ, Gingras S. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. CMAJ. 1997;156(6):797‑802.
Shaikh F, Shaikh S, Shaikh N. Outcome of primigravida with high head at term. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(9):1012-4.
Maillet R, Martin A, Riethmuller D. Are too many or too few episiotomies performed? CNGOF, Extract from Updates in Gynecology and Obstetrics. 28th National Conference: Paris, 2004;XXVIII:21-34.
Vendittelli F, Gallot D. Recommendations for clinical practice: Episiotomy. What are the epidemiological data concerning episiotomy?. Gynecol Obstet Fert. 2006;34:275-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
