Maternal complications and success rates of vaginal delivery in women with a previous caesarean section: experience from Dhaka Medical College Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262082Keywords:
VBAC, Trial of labour, Maternal outcome, Caesarean sectionAbstract
Background: Caesarean section rates are rising globally, with previous caesarean sections being a leading reason for repeats. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is key to reducing this trend. However, local data on VBAC outcomes in Bangladesh are scarce. This study evaluated the success rate of vaginal delivery and maternal complications among women with previous caesarean sections who underwent a trial of labour at a tertiary hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, from April to October 2023. One hundred women with one or two previous caesarean sections who were planned for vaginal delivery were enrolled. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 29.8±11.4 years, with 62.0% living in urban areas. Most (82.0%) were at term gestation and fetal distress was the main reason for prior caesarean section (57.0%). VBAC success was 76.0%. Of the 24 failed labour trials, non-progress with impending uterine rupture led to repeat caesarean (19 cases). The maternal complication rate was 17.0%, with postpartum hemorrhage, wound infection and perineal injury rates of 9.0 %, 5.0% and 3.0%, respectively. No cases of uterine rupture were recorded.
Conclusion: VBAC is feasible and safe for carefully selected women in tertiary settings in Bangladesh. A 76.0% success rate and low serious complication rate support structured labour trial programs in well-equipped institutions.
References
Raising Children Network. Vaginal birth: A guide. Available at: https://raisingchildren.net.au/pregnancy /labourbirth/vaginal-Cesarean-birth/vaginal-birth. Accessed on 05 March 2026.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe J, Hoffman BL, Spong CY, et al. Williams Obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2014;24:609-21.
McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes Jr WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. Eng J Med. 1996;335(10):689-95.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin# 54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:203-12.
Chiniwar MA. Study of feto-maternal outcome in previous cesarean section. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(9):3848-52.
Akter MJ, Shirin E. The outcome of Vaginal Birth after one caesarean section (VBAC). J Bangladesh College Physic Surg. 2021;39(1):36-45.
Frass KA, Al Harazi AH. Outcome of vaginal birth after caesarean section in women with one previous section and spontaneous onset of labour. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 2021;17(8):646-50.
Nazaneen S, Kumari A, Malhotra J, Rahman Z, Pankaj S, Alam A. Study of intraoperative complications associated with repeat cesarean sections at a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. IOSR-JDMS. 2017;16(8):77-82.
Rezai S, Labine M, Gottimukkala S, Karp S, Sainvil L, Isidore G, et al. Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) for Vaginal Birth after Previous Cesarean Section (VBAC) versus repeat cesarean section: a review. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2016;4(6):135.
Dy J, DeMeester S, Lipworth H, Barrett J. No. 382-trial of labour after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2019;41(7):992-1011.
Mekonnen BD, Asfaw AA. Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):65.
Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2019;19(1):360.
Girma Y, Menlkalew Z, Destaw A. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section and its associated factors in Mizan Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2021;7(11).
Bumrungrad International Hospital. The benefits to be gained from vaginal delivery. Available at: https://www.bumrungrad.com/en/health-blog/january -2019/vaginal-delivery. Accessed on 05 March 2026.
Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Wojdyla D. Rates of cesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98-113.
Scott JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a common-sense approach. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:342-50.
Begum T, Rahman A, Nababan H, Hoque DM, Khan AF, Ali T, et al. Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: Evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh. PloS One. 2017;12(11):e0188074.
Mekonnin FT, Bulto GA. Determinants of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section at public hospitals in Ambo Town, Oromia Region, Central Ethiopia: a case-control study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021:4083:91.
Siraneh Y, Assefa F, Tesfaye M. Feto-maternal outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean and associated factors among mothers with previous cesarean scar at Attat Lord Merry Primary Hospital, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia. J Pregnancy Child Health. 2018;5(5):390.
Birara M, Gebrehiwot Y. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):31.
Tsai HT, Wu CH. Vaginal birth after cesarean section—The world trend and local experience in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(1):41-5.
Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):907-10.
Hendler I, Bujold E. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(2):273-7.
Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1656-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
