Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women and its perinatal outcome: a descriptive, observational and prospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262534Keywords:
Bacterial vaginosis, Prevalence, Pregnant, Perinatal, Outcome, Preterm laborAbstract
Background: Pregnancy is commonly associated with increased vaginal discharge which is often non-pathological while bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis and trichomoniasis are associated with abnormal vaginal discharge. However, most cases of abnormal vaginal discharge in pregnant women are treated inappropriately as candidiasis as a result of inadequate investigation of other causes. Bacterial vaginosis is a polymicrobial syndrome characterized by loss of normal vaginal flora and increase in other species like Gardenella vaginalis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mobiluncus, Mycoplasma, Bacteriodes, Peptostreptococcus and Prevotella. It has severe adverse outcomes in pregnancy which include preterm labour, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), spontaneous abortion, increased risk of peripartum infections. Current study aims to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women using easily available, rapid, inexpensive, diagnostic tests and its adverse maternal and fetal outcome in pregnancy.
Methods: 150 antenatal women attending the outpatient clinic as well as the admitted patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology satisfying the inclusion criteria and who had given well written and informed consent were enrolled for the study. We studied the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in these women using Amsel’s criteria and Nugent scoring and correlated it with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Results: Out of the 150 pregnant women screened, 35 women were tested positive as per Amsel’s criteria (23.3%). According to Nugent scoring, 16 out 150 pregnant women screened had a score of more than 7(10.6%). Out of the 16 women tested positive, 12 of them had preterm delivery and PPROM (75%), 7 of them delivered small for gestational age (SGA) babies (43.75%), and 15 of the delivered babies required NICU admission (93.75%).
Conclusions: The above results suggest that universal screening for all antenatal patients for bacterial vaginosis should be done during antenatal visits as they are rapid and inexpensive along with effective treatment of the same to avoid perinatal complications. More focus needs to be done on prevention of preterm labour and PPROM, rather than treatment of the same, once it occurs.
References
Berek JS, Novak E. Berek and Novak's Gynecology. 18th South Asian ed. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer; 2022.
Kulkarni P, Wagh G. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women and its association with adverse perinatal outcomes. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2020;7(2):179-84.
Toboso Silgo L, Cruz-Melguizo S, de la Cruz Conty ML, Encinas Pardilla MB, Muñoz Algarra M, Nieto Jiménez Y, et al. Screening for Vaginal and Endocervical Infections in the First Trimester of Pregnancy? A Study That Ignites an Old Debate. Pathogens. 2021;10(12):1610.
Bhakta V, Aslam S, Aljaghwani A. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: prevalence and outcomes in a tertiary care hospital. Afr J Reprod Health. 2021;25(1):49-55.
Hoffmann E, Váncsa S, Váradi A, Hegyi P, Nagy R, Hamar B, et al. Routine screening of abnormal vaginal flora during pregnancy reduces the odds of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13897.
Ezeigwe CO, Eleje GU, Anikwe CC, Ikwuka DC, Okpala BC, Irikannu KC, et al. Effectiveness of Gardnerellavaginalis culture and Nugent scoring in identifying bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Infect Dis Res. 2023;4(2):10.
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297-301.
Ambike AS, Shelke Y, Nakhate P, Patil S, Sankholkar C. Prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in a tertiary care rural hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(9):3673.
Bhavana AM, Kumari PHP, Mohan N, Chandrasekhar V, Vijayalakshmi P, Manasa RV. Bacterial vaginosis and antibacterial susceptibility pattern of asymptomatic urinary tract infection in pregnant women at a tertiary care hospital, Visakhapatnam, India. Iran J Microbiol. 2019;11(6):488.
Madhivanan P, Krupp K, Chandrasekaran V, Karat C, Arun A, Cohen CR, et al. Prevalence and correlates of bacterial vaginosis among young women of reproductive age in Mysore, India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26(2):132-7.
Mulinganya G, De Vulder A, Bisimwa G, Boelens J, Claeys G, De Keyser K, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes of second trimester bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0257939.
Shetty PK, Menon AG, Rai R. Prevelance, risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10:3407-12.
Mohanta C, Pradhan K, Nath SS, Sahoo SK. Bacterial Vaginosis in pregnancy and it's fetomaternal outcome. Indian J Appl Res. 2017;7(3):76-82.
Gupta A, Singh S, Chaudhary R, Nigam S. Bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (< 28 weeks) and its effect on pregnancy outcome: a study from a western up city. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2016;3(2):90-4.
Ng BK, Chuah JN, Cheah FC, Mohamed Ismail NA, Tan GC, Wong KK, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Front Surg. 2023;10:1084867.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
