DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170387

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of obstetrical ultrasound in Conakry, Guinea

Telly S. Y., Daniel William Athanasse Leno, Moussa Kantara Camara, Yolande Hyjazi, Namory Keita

Abstract


Background: The authors report an initial assessment of the practice of obstetrical ultrasound in Conakry in order to make suggestions to improve the quality of services in Guinea.

Methods: It is about a cross-sectional study of three months (August 1st to October 31st, 2013) conducted in Conakry. The study population consisted of health personnel performing fetal ultrasounds in Conakry and who agreed to participate in the survey. The data collected were about the socio-professional characteristics of the service providers, their knowledge and attitudes. The data were analyzed in a simple descriptive statistical analysis way. The results were analyzed according to the norms and standards issued by the French Fetal Ultrasound College and the National Technical Committee for Prenatal Diagnosis Ultrasound.

Results: Twenty one service providers over twenty-six (80.8%) were male (80.8%) aged 40-49 years old (46.2%), obstetrician-gynecologists (76.9%), working in a public hospital (46.2%) and not having an ultrasound degree (59.2%). Eight service providers over twenty-six ((30.8%) affirmed knowing the recommended period for a fetal biometry. The majority (60%) indicated measuring the nuchal translucency and 85.2% (22/26) the craniocaudal length. The anatomical landmarks were not correctly identified in 75.2% of cases for the biparietal and the head circumference and in 63.8% of cases for abdominal circumference. Nine service providers over twenty-six (34.6%) affirmed explaining the limitations of ultrasound. Eighteen devices over twenty-six (69.2%) had more than 9 years of age, 73% (19/26) of them did not have a vaginal probe and 65.3% (17/26) did not have a pulsed wave Doppler.

Conclusions: Improving the quality of the practice of obstetrical ultrasound in Guinea goes through training of service providers, establishing distribution and compliance with norms and standards as well as quality control of ultrasound devices.


Keywords


Attitudes, Guinea, Knowledge, Obstetrical ultrasound, Practices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anonyme. ACR–ACOG–AIUM–SRU Practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound. Available from: http://www.acr.org/~/media/f7bc35bd59264e7cbe648f6d1bb8b8e2.pdf.

Collège français d’échographie fœtale (CFEF). Guide d’examen échographique du fœtus à 12, 22 et 32 SA. Available from: https://www.cfef.org/archives/communication/guide1

Lansac J. Rapport du Comité national technique de l’échographie de dépistage prénatal. L’échographie de diagnostic 2010. Available from: http://www.cngof.asso.fr/D_TELE/100513_rapport_echo.pdf.

Gilani SA. Ultrasound training and research in developing countries. DSJUOG. 2011;5:297-320.

Mubuuke AG, Kiguli-Malwadde E, Businge F, Byanyima RK. Utilisation of obstetric sonography at a peri-urban health centre in Uganda.Pan African Medical Journal. 2011;7:24.

Kongnyuy EJ, van den Broek N.The use of ultrasonography in obstetrics in developing countries.Trop Doct. 2007;37:70-2.

Sureau C, Henrion R. Comité National Technique de l’Echographie de Dépistage Prénatal Rapport du Comité National Technique de l’Echographie de Dépistage Prénatal. Paris. Documentation française. 2005. 175 p.

Boog G, Guenier B. Enquête régionale dans les Pays-de-la-Loire sur la qualité des échographies du premier trimestre de la grossesse. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2000;29:751-7.

Moifo B, Dzeukam A, Tebere H, Foumane P, Tambe J, Gonsu Fotsin J. Evaluation des connaissances et attitudes pratiques en échographie systématique du premier trimestre de la Grossesse au Cameroun. Health Sci Dis. 2013 ;14(3):1-6.

Matar M, Picone O, Dalmon C, Ayoubi JM. Evaluation des connaissances des échographistes sur les clichés d’échographie de dépistage du deuxième trimestre recommandé par le Comité technique national de l’échographie. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2013;42:473-8.

Moreira PM, Guèye M, Faye Diémé ME, Mbaye M, Kane Guèye SM, et al. Obstetrical Ultrasound in Senegal: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice. J Womens Health, Issues Care. 2013;2:3.

Vangeenderhuysen C, Abdellahi MB, Isselmou S. La formation des sages-femmes en échographie obstétricale dans les pays en développement : pourquoi et comment ? 2002; 31: 100-6

Kimberly HH, Murray A, Mennicke M, Liteplo A, Lew J, Bohan JS, et al. Focused maternal ultrasound by midwives in rural Zambia. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1267-72.

Bonnett TJ, Roberts AL, Houlden EM. Obstetric ultrasound training for midwives in a resource-poor setting.RCOG World Congress 2013 Poster # EP5.50 Liverpool UK, 24-26 June 2013.

Echographie au cours de la grossesse en l’absence de facteurs de risqué. Service des recommandations et Références professionnelles. Décembre 1998. http//www.anaes.fr. Consulté en ligne le 21 novembre 2013.

Enligne: http://www.cfef.org./archives/ communication/guide1.html consulté le 21 novembre 2013.

Collège français d’échographie fœtale (CFEF). En ligne: http://www.cfef.org./archives/communication/guide1.html consulté le 21 novembre 2013.

Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Ville Y. First trimester ultrasound should be a tailored examination J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2004;33(5):375-7.

Cisse R, Ouadréogo A, Tapsoba T, Lougué C, Ouedraogo CMR, Ouattara T, Lankoande J, et Koné B. Biométrie fœtale ultrasonore dans la ville de Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. A propos d’une cohorte de 126 gestantes. J Radiol. 2000;81:509-15.

Jaumain P, Puech F, Subtil D, Bourgeot PDJ. Evaluation de la qualité des échographies du premier trimestre dans le cadre du dépistage intégré de la trisomie 21 fœtale. 2005 :1-6.

Dudley NJ, Chapman E. The importance of quality management in fetal measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;151(3):333-7.

Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurement. Br J Obstet Gynaeco.l 1994;101(1):35-43.

Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A et al. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur lengh. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):132-5.

Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A et al. Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):125-31.

Nisand I. The practice of ultrasonography in gynecology-obstetrics: standard performance and results. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1994;23:532-8..

Pasquet C, Sicot C. Risque et responsabilité en échographie anténatale. Concours Méd. 1998;120:318-21.