Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes using ejaculated versus testicular sperm in severe male factor infertility: a retrospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261843Keywords:
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Testicular sperm aspiration, Male infertility, Embryo development, Clinical pregnancy rate, Assisted reproductive technologyAbstract
Background: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using testicular sperm is commonly performed in severe male factor infertility. However, differences in sperm maturity and function between ejaculated and testicular sperm may influence reproductive outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 92 ICSI cycles from 84 couples treated between January 2018 and December 2024 at the Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Madras Medical Mission. Cycles were grouped according to sperm source: fresh ejaculate (n=61), fresh testicular sperm aspiration (fresh TESA) (n=25), and frozen testicular sperm aspiration (frozen TESA) (n=6). Outcomes assessed included fertilization, embryo arrest, embryo transfer (ET), and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR).
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable among groups. The number of normally fertilized oocytes (2PN) was significantly higher in the fresh ejaculate group than in fresh and frozen TESA groups (7.08±4.4 vs 5.12±3.1 vs 3.17±2.9; p=0.021). The number of frozen embryos was also significantly higher with ejaculated sperm (p=0.02). Embryo arrest was highest in frozen TESA cycles (33.3%) compared to fresh TESA (8%) and ejaculated sperm cycles (3.3%) (p=0.02). Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was higher with ejaculated sperm (50.8%) than fresh TESA (36%) and frozen TESA (0%) (p=0.042).
Conclusions: ICSI cycles using ejaculated sperm were associated with better embryological outcomes compared to testicular sperm cycles. Frozen testicular sperm cycles demonstrated relatively poorer embryo developmental outcomes; however, interpretation is limited by the small sample size. Despite lower overall success, testicular sperm remains an important option when ejaculated sperm is unavailable.
References
Sabanegh E, Agarwal A, Goldstein M. Male infertility. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, USA. 2012:616-48.
Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ, Conway DI, Foster PA, Hinton RA, et al. Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;291(6510):1693-7.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Fertility assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. NICE Clin Guidel. 2013;156. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156. Accessed on 29 April 2026.
O’Donnell L. Mechanisms of spermiogenesis and spermiation and how they are disturbed. Spermatogenesis. 2014;4:e979623.
Said TM, Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ, Sikka SC. Impact of sperm morphology and DNA damage on fertilization and embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):673-80.
Naru T, Rizvi J, Wajid S, Nabi G. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome using ejaculated sperm and retrieved sperm in azoospermic men. Urol J. 2008;5(2):106-10.
Vishwekar PS, Lad N, Shivtare M, Shetty P. ICSI outcome in surgically retrieved sperm compared with ejaculated sperm control. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(3):869-75.
Jamal W, Vélez MP, Zini A, Phillips S, Hemmings R, Kadoch IJ. Surgically retrieved spermatozoa versus ejaculated spermatozoa in modified natural IVF- ICSI cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(3):242-7.
Khalili MA, Manouchehri MA, Dehghani V. Treatment outcome following intracytoplasmic injection of sperm retrieved from ejaculate, epididymis, or testis of infertile men. Arch Iranian Med. 2004;7(3):232-6.
Negri L, Patrizio P, Albani E, Morenghi E, Benaglia R, Desgro M, et al. ICSI outcome is significantly better with testicular spermatozoa in patients with necrozoospermia: a retrospective study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(1):48-52.
Pasqualotto FF, Rossi-Ferragut LM, Rocha CC, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic injection of epididymal and testicular sperm obtained from patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002;167:1753-6.
Nicopoullos JD, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Norman-Taylor J, Grace I, Ramsay JW. Use of surgical sperm retrieval in azoospermic men: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:691-701.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
