Acceptance and outcomes of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion in a tertiary care hospital: a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262349Keywords:
Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device, PPIUCD, Cu-T 380A, Postpartum contraception, Long-acting reversible contraception, Family planning, Unmet needAbstract
Background: The postpartum period is an ideal time to address the unmet need for contraception. The postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is a safe, effective, long-acting, reversible, and non-hormonal contraceptive that can be inserted immediately after delivery or within 48 hours. Objectives were to evaluate acceptance, demographic profile, reasons for acceptance and refusal, and clinical outcomes of PPIUCD insertion among postpartum women.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Dhiraj Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, from January 2024 to January 2025. A total of 1,500 antenatal and postpartum women were counselled regarding PPIUCD. Of these, 300 women accepted copper T (Cu-T) 380A insertion and were followed up at 6 weeks and 6 months. Data on acceptance, demographic characteristics, reasons for acceptance/refusal, complications, expulsions, and removals were analysed.
Results: The acceptance rate was 22.2%. Most acceptors were 20-24 years old, second gravida (60%), and educated (82%). Intra-caesarean insertion was performed in 70% of cases. Convenience, long-term contraception, avoidance of an additional hospital visit, and absence of hormonal side effects were the main reasons for acceptance, while inability to make an independent decision without partner involvement was the commonest reason for refusal. At 6 weeks, 66% of women were asymptomatic, increasing to 94.7% at 6 months. No uterine perforation or pelvic infection occurred. Six expulsions and 14 removals were recorded during follow-up.
Conclusions: PPIUCD is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated postpartum contraceptive with high continuation and low complication rates. Strengthening antenatal counselling and partner involvement may improve acceptance.
References
Oche OM, Ango JT, Yusuf AS. Postpartum resumption of sexual activity, sexual morbidity and use of modern contraceptives among Nigerian women in Jos. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(2):210-6.
Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(8):589-94.
Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(8):798-805.
Shults RA, Arndt V, Olshan AF, Martin CF, Royce RA. Effects of short interpregnancy intervals on small-for-gestational-age and preterm births. Epidemiology. 1999;10(3):250-4.
Fuentes-Afflick E, Hessol NA. Interpregnancy interval and the risk of premature infants. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(3):383-90.
DeFranco EA, Stamilio DM, Boslaugh SE, Gross GA, Muglia LJ. A short interpregnancy interval is a risk factor for preterm birth and its recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):264.e1-6.
Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327(7410):313.
Klerman LV, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL. The impact of short interpregnancy intervals on pregnancy outcomes in a low-income population. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(8):1182-5.
Government of India. Postpartum IUCD Reference Manual. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2012.
Ross JA, Winfrey WL. Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2001;27(1):20-7.
Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1810-27.
Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89(1):S7-24.
Srivastav R, Srivastav DK, Jina R. Contraceptive knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP survey). J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005;55(6):546-50.
Hooda R, Mann S, Nanda S, Gupta A, More H. Immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions in caesarean and vaginal deliveries: a comparative study of follow-up outcomes. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016:7695847.
Blanchard H, MacKaig C. Postpartum contraception. ACCESS-FP Program. 2006.
Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-caesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(5):337-43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
