Outcome of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device in caesarean versus vaginal insertion: a comparative study

Authors

  • Aswathy Shanavas Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sree Avittom Thirunal Hospital, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
  • Sujamol Jacob Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sree Avittom Thirunal Hospital, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
  • Nirmala Chellamma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sree Avittom Thirunal Hospital, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170407

Keywords:

Intra uterine contraceptive device, Intra cesarean, Post placental, Postpartum contraception

Abstract

Background: Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive device is a novel approach to contraception which integrates Maternal - Child health and family planning services. It is a postpartum method which provides long term reversible contraception to women before discharge from the delivery setting. More research is needed in the field of PPIUCD to enhance awareness and acceptance in the community. This study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy of PPIUCD inserted at cesarean versus vaginal delivery.

Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at Sree Avittom Thirunal Hospital, Govt. Medical College, and Kerala – A tertiary care teaching institution. A total of 126 patients with cesarean or vaginal deliveries had PPIUCD insertions and they were followed up for a period of one year. The outcome measures analyzed were safety measures – menstrual irregularities, vaginal discharge, pelvic infection and perforation and efficacy measures - failure, expulsion and removal. Data are expressed in frequency and percentage. Chi square test was used for comparison and P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The study shows that PPIUCD is an effective intervention in both cesarean and vaginal delivery with no significant differences in safety and efficacy depending on the route of insertion. There was no case of perforation or failure and no significant risk of infection in either group. Spontaneous expulsion occurred in two cases inserted by vaginal route. Missing string incidence is high in the cesarean group compared to vaginal insertion.

Conclusions: PPIUCD is a safe effective and convenient method of contraception and should be encouraged in both vaginal and cesarean deliveries.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Family Planning Needs during Extended Post-Partum Period in Asia: USAID/ACCESS 2009.

Postpartum IUCD reference manual, Family Planning Division. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India, 2010.

Usha Ram, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Dept. of Public health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, MUMBAI– paper presentation in the International Conference on Family Planning, November 15-18, 2009 at Munyonyo, Uganda.

Barbara Deller for Elaine Charurat, Postpartum IUCD (PPIUCD): opportunities for a languishing innovation. 2007.

Rivero-Fuentes, Estela. 2008: Original data analysis of data sets from the Dominican Republic, Haiti and Nicaragua used in Quuiteroetal. 2007.

Smith KB. Is postpartum contraceptive advice given antenatal of value? Contraception. 2002;65(3):237-43.

Mohamed SA, kamel MA, Shaaban OM, Salem HT. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12(3):170-5.

Parikh V, Gandhi AS. Safety of Copper T as contraceptive After Cesarean Section. J Indian Med Assoc. 1989-87:113-5.

Shukla M, Qureshi S. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion – a five year experience at a tertiary care center in North India. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2012;136(3):432-5.

Gupta A, Verma A, Chauhan J. Evaluation of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD 380 A insertion in a teaching hospital of Western UP. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;2:204-8.

Sood B, Asif R. Revitalization of postpartum IUCD (PPIUCD) services: experience from India. Contraception. 2012;86(2):184-5.

Welkovic S, Costa L. Post-partum bleeding and infection after post-placental IUD insertion: Contraception. 2001;63(3):155-8.

Eroglua K, Akkuzu G. Comparison of efficacy and complication of IUD insertion in immediate post placental and early postpartum period with 1 year follow up. Contraception. 2006;74:376-81.

United Nations population Information Network (POPIN). UN population division. Department of Economic and Social Affairs with Support from UN Population Fund. Network Intrauterine devices. Family Health International. 1996;16(2).

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

Shanavas, A., Jacob, S., & Chellamma, N. (2017). Outcome of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device in caesarean versus vaginal insertion: a comparative study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6(2), 694–699. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170407

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles