A comparative study of maternal and fetal outcomes in women with or without epidural analgesia during labour

Neetu; Kamlesh Yadav; Shubham Janu; Harshita Bihani; Richa Kachhawa; Megha Bansal; Divya Soni; Toshan Bunkar

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263993

Authors

Neetu Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SPMC, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Kamlesh Yadav Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SPMC, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Shubham Janu Department of Anaesthesiology, SPMС, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Harshita Bihani Department of Anaesthesiology, SPMС, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Richa Kachhawa Department of Anaesthesiology, SPMС, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Megha Bansal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SPMC, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Divya Soni Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SPMC, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
Toshan Bunkar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SPMC, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263993

Keywords:

Epidural analgesia, Labour pain, Maternal outcome, Neonatal outcome, Ropivacaine

Abstract

Background: Epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for labour pain relief . Despite its widespread acceptance, concerns continue regarding its influence on labour progression, mode of delivery, maternal complications, and neonatal outcomes. Our study aimed to compare maternal and fetal outcomes between women receiving epidural analgesia and those undergoing labour without epidural analgesia.

Methods: A hospital-based observational comparative study was conducted at a tertiary care centre, from October 2025 to April 2026. Seventy primigravid women with single term pregnancies were enrolled, 35 women received epidural analgesia using low-dose Ropivacaine with Fentanyl, while 35 women underwent labour without epidural analgesia. Maternal haemodynamic parameters, labour characteristics, mode of delivery, maternal complications, pain relief, neonatal Apgar scores, need for neonatal resuscitation, and NICU admission were compared between the two groups.

Results: Baseline demographic and obstetric characteristics were comparable between both groups. Epidural analgesia produced excellent pain relief with stable maternal haemodynamics. A transient reduction in systolic blood pressure was observed during the first 15–20 minutes after epidural administration without clinically significant adverse effects. The duration of the second stage of labour was slightly prolonged in the epidural group; however, there was no statistically significant increase in caesarean delivery or adverse neonatal outcomes. Apgar scores, neonatal resuscitation, and NICU admissions were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: Low-dose epidural analgesia is a safe and effective technique for labour pain management. It provides superior maternal comfort without adversely affecting maternal or neonatal outcomes and should be offered to eligible women delivering in tertiary care centres.

References

Akkamahadevi P, Srinivas HT, Siddesh A, Kadli N. Comparison of efficacy of sufentanil and fentanyl with low concentration bupivacaine for combined spinal epidural labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56(4):365-9.

Sharma RM, Setlur R, Bhargava AK, Vardhan S. Walking epidural: an effective method of labour pain relief. Med J Armed Forces India. 2007;63(1):44-6.

Li B, Liao Y, Wang Q, He S, Yang L, Jia J, et al. Association between epidural-related maternal fever and short- and long-term prognosis of parturients: a prospective observational study. Front Surg. 2023;9:1064272.

Sultan P, Halpern SH, Pushpanathan E, Patel S, Carvalho B. Labour epidural analgesia and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(6):e215-e217

Samanta S, Jain K, Bhardwaj N, Jain V, Samanta S, Saha R. Maternal and foetal outcome after epidural labour analgesia in high-risk pregnancies. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(2):115-20.

Lin R, Shi P, Li H, Liu Z, Xu Z. Association between epidural analgesia and indications for intrapartum caesarean delivery in group 1 of the 10-group classification system at a tertiary maternity hospital, Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):464.

Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, DerSimonian R. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: a quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):970-7.

Callahan EC, Dyer RA, Sultan P, et al. Current perspectives on labour epidural analgesia and its effects on labour outcomes. Anesthesiol Clin. 2023;41(2):243-58.

Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5).

Deshmukh VL, Ghosh SS, Yelikar KA, Gadappa SN. Effects of epidural labour analgesia in mother and foetus. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018;68(2):111-6.

Riveros-Perez E, Polania-Gutierrez JJ, Avella-Molano B. Fetal heart rate changes and labor neuraxial analgesia: a machine learning approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):329.

Choudhary J, Sharma H, Acharya V. Maternal and fetal outcome in epidural analgesia study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(10):3547-51.

Younes M, Gamil K, Elgarhy AM. Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl for labor pain control: a comparative study with continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine. Ain-Shams J Anaesthesiol. 2017;10:230-6.

Chattopadhyay I, Basu S, Jha AK. Timing of administration of epidural analgesia and risk of operative delivery in nulliparous women: a case-control randomized study. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care. 2018;8(1):16-9.

Zang L, Xu C, Li Y. Impact of epidural analgesia using sufentanil combined with low concentration ropivacaine on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):239