A retrospective study of surgical site infections post caesarean section in a secondary care hospital

Ishita Mehera; Jyoti Baghel

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20264003

Authors

Ishita Mehera Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Jyoti Baghel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20264003

Keywords:

Surgical site infection, Caesarean section, Obstetric surgery, Secondary-care hospital, Wound infection

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an important healthcare-associated complication following caesarean section and may result in maternal morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, increased healthcare expenditure, and delayed wound healing. Identification of associated risk factors and strengthening preventive practices are essential, particularly in secondary-care settings. Aim was to determine the frequency, pattern, and associated patient-related risk factors of SSI following caesarean section and to identify measures that may contribute to improved infection prevention and postoperative care.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a secondary-care health facility from April 2020 to March 2024. Hospital records of women who underwent caesarean section and subsequently developed SSI were reviewed. Available demographic, obstetric, surgical, and postoperative data, including wound-related complications and management up to 6 weeks after surgery, were analysed.

Results: During the four-year study period, 4,948 caesarean sections were performed, of which 519 (10.4%) were complicated by SSI. Among women with SSI, 122 (23.5%) had superficial wound infections, while 397 (76.4%) developed severe wound gaping requiring re-suturing. The most frequently identified risk factors were obesity (28%), anaemia (24%), and a history of previous surgery (22%), followed by personal hygiene-related factors (14%) and other or unspecified factors (12%). The annual number of caesarean sections increased progressively from 935 to 1,426, whereas the SSI rate declined from 8.1% in 2020-2021 to 6.8% in 2023-2024.

Conclusions: SSI remains a significant postoperative complication following caesarean section, with obesity, anaemia, and previous surgery being prominent associated factors. The decline in SSI rates despite increasing caesarean volumes underscores the potential value of strengthened infection-prevention practices and postoperative surveillance. Early identification of high-risk women, adherence to aseptic surgical practices, appropriate perioperative care, and timely management of wound complications may reduce SSI-related morbidity and improve the quality of obstetric surgical care.

References

Badia JM, Casey AL, Petrosillo N, Hudson PM, Mitchell SA, Crosby C. Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96(1):1-15.

Mojtahedi MF, Sepidarkish M, Almukhtar M, Eslami Y, Mohammadianamiri F, Behzad Moghadam K, et al. Global incidence of surgical site infections following cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2023;139:82-92.

Islam N, Thalib L, Mahmood S, Varol SA, Adel I, Aqel A, et al. Regional variations in incidence of surgical site infection and associated risk factors in women undergoing cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intens Crit Care Nurs. 2025;89:103951.

Yang Z, Wang D, Yang M, Deng J, Liu Y. Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients undergoing obstetrics and gynecology surgeries: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0296193.

Guo L, Huang S, Sui H, Li W. Incidence and influencing factors for surgical site infections after cesarean section in China: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025;51(1):e16172.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on prophylactic antibiotics for women undergoing cesarean section. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on choice of antiseptic agent and method of application for preoperative skin preparation for cesarean section. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

Harish Babu BG, Narmadha NS, Lakshmi Soujanya D, Rathika R, MJ HA. Surgical wound infections in obstetrics and gynecology: a study from rural tertiary care hospital. Int J Innov Res Med Sci. 2017;2(12):1569.

Umare M, Kumar K. Study of surgical site infections in obstetrics and gynaecology in a tertiary care setup. Int J Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021;5(1):148-151.

Hager R, Daltveit A, Hofoss D, Nilsen S, Kolaas T, Øian P, et al. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):428-34.

Ehrenkranz N, Blacwelder W, Pfaff S, Poppe D, Yerg D, Kaslow R. Infections complicating low-risk cesarean sections in community hospitals: efﬁcacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:337-43.

Nielsen T, Hokegard K. Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146(8):911-6.

Tran T, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A. Risk factors for post cesarean surgical site infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(3):367-71.

Couto R, Pedrosa T, Nogueira J, Gomes D, Neto M, Rezende N. Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1998;61(3):227-31.