Successful management of a monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy with extensive cord entanglement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263694Keywords:
Monoamniotic twins, Monochorionic twins, Cord entanglement, Caesarean section, Preterm birthAbstract
Monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancy is rare and is associated with fetal loss, congenital anomalies, prematurity and umbilical cord entanglement. We report the management and outcome of a 29-year-old primigravida in whom a single placenta, two fetuses and no intertwin membrane were identified at 9 weeks of gestation. Surveillance included ultrasound assessment every 2 weeks from 16 weeks, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Doppler studies, fetal echocardiography at 20-22 weeks, and inpatient fetal surveillance from 30 weeks. A planned caesarean birth was performed at 32+1 weeks, consistent with guidance recommending planned preterm birth for uncomplicated MCMA twins. Two female neonates weighing 1.5 kg and 1.4 kg were delivered. Both received neonatal intensive care for 15 days and were discharged in stable condition. Maternal recovery was uncomplicated. Marked entanglement of the two umbilical cords was documented intraoperatively. This case illustrates that extensive cord entanglement may coexist with a favourable outcome when early diagnosis, structured surveillance, planned preterm caesarean birth and neonatal support are available.
References
Kilby MD, Bricker L. Management of monochorionic twin pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 51 (2024 partial update). BJOG. 2025;132(6):e98-129.
Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacós E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(2):253-76.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Twin and triplet pregnancy. NICE guideline NG137. London: NICE; 2019. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng137. Accessed on 01 October 2026.
Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):131-5.
D'Antonio F, Odibo AO, Berghella V, Khalil A, Hack K, Saccone G, et al. Perinatal mortality, timing of delivery and prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):166-74.
MONOMONO Working Group. Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: the MONOMONO study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):175-83.
Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Khalil A, Binder J, Waring G, Sturgiss SN, et al. Prevalence, antenatal management and perinatal outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: a collaborative multicenter study in England, 2000-2013. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):184-92.
Söderhult L, Tiblad E, Herling L. Perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies during a 10-year period: a single-center descriptive study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):233-9.
Buca D, Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Acharya G, Van Mieghem T, Hack K, et al. Neonatal morbidity of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2022;39(3):243-51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hussam Mohamedalhalabi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.