Premenopausal ovarian cysts: a practical evidence-based approach to risk assessment, tumor markers, surveillance and surgical management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20263693Keywords:
Adnexal mass, Ovarian cyst, Premenopausal women, IOTA, O-RADS, CA125Abstract
Ovarian cysts are common in premenopausal women, and most are physiological or benign. Assessment aims to identify lesions that require further investigation or treatment while avoiding unnecessary surgery and loss of ovarian tissue. This narrative review examines ultrasound characterization, malignancy risk assessment, tumor markers, surveillance, surgical management, and fertility considerations. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) is the first-line investigation, and lesion morphology should be interpreted alongside symptoms, age, and clinical history. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules and ADNEX model, together with the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System, provide structured approaches to risk assessment. Tumor-marker testing should follow the differential diagnosis. CA125 has limited specificity in premenopausal women, whereas suspected germ-cell or sex-cord stromal tumors may require other markers. Many confidently characterized simple cysts can be managed without intervention. Follow-up depends on lesion type, size, symptoms, and the imaging framework used; persistence alone does not establish malignancy. Indeterminate masses may require expert ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, and suspicious lesions warrant gynecological oncology assessment. Acute presentations require urgent evaluation outside elective surveillance pathways. When surgery is appropriate for benign disease, the approach should minimize morbidity and preserve ovarian tissue where feasible. Management therefore requires integration of imaging findings, clinical risk, reproductive priorities, and patient preferences.
References
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of suspected ovarian masses in premenopausal women. Green-top Guideline No. 62. London: RCOG; 2011. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/ovarian-masses-in-premenopausal-women-management-of-suspected-green-top-guideline-no-62/. Accessed on 03 October 2026.
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, Landolfo C, du Bois A, Chiva L, et al. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE consensus statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(1):148-68.
Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(5):500-5.
Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, Epstein E, Melis GB, Guerriero S, et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ. 2010;341:c6839.
Van Calster B, Van Hoorde K, Valentin L, Testa AC, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, et al. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ. 2014;349:g5920.
Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, Froyman W, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, et al. O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: a consensus guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology. 2020;294(1):168-85.
Strachowski LM, Jha P, Phillips CH, Blanchette Porter MM, Froyman W, Glanc P, et al. O-RADS US v2022: an update from the American College of Radiology's Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US Committee. Radiology. 2023;308(3):e230685.
Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, Benacerraf B, Benson CB, Brewster WR, et al. Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology. 2010;256(3):943-54.
Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. NICE guideline NG12. London: NICE. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12. Accessed on 03 October 2026.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Adnexal torsion in adolescents: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 783. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):e56-63.
Timmerman D, Valentin L, Testa AC, Froyman W, Landolfo C, Kotlarz A, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: updated consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2026;67(5):702-24.
Levine D, Patel MD, Suh-Burgmann EJ, Andreotti RF, Benacerraf BR, Benson CB, et al. Simple adnexal cysts: SRU consensus conference update on follow-up and reporting. Radiology. 2019;293(2):359-71.
Sadowski EA, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Maturen KE, Forstner R, Jha P, et al. O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: guide for assessing adnexal lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee. Radiology. 2022;303(1):35-47.
Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, et al. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919896.
Barreñada L, Ledger A, Dhiman P, Collins G, Wynants L, Verbakel JY, et al. ADNEX risk prediction model for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies. BMJ Med. 2024;3(1):e000817.
American College of Radiology. O-RADS US v2022 assessment categories. 2022. Available at: https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/O-RADS/US-v2022/O-RADS--US-v2022-Assessment-Categories.pdf. Accessed on 03 October 2026.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ovarian cancer: recognition and initial management. Clinical guideline CG122. London: NICE; 2011. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg122/chapter/Recommendations. Accessed on 03 October 2026.
Ray-Coquard I, Morice P, Lorusso D, Prat J, Oaknin A, Pautier P, et al. Non-epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv1-18.
Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(10):922-9.
Smith-Bindman R, Poder L, Johnson E, Miglioretti DL. Risk of malignant ovarian cancer based on ultrasonography findings in a large unselected population. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(1):71-7.
Froyman W, Landolfo C, De Cock B, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Testa AC, et al. Risk of complications in patients with conservatively managed ovarian tumours (IOTA5): a 2-year interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(3):448-58.
Grimes DA, Jones LB, Lopez LM, Schulz KF. Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD006134.
Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD004751.
Raffi F, Metwally M, Amer S. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):3146-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hussam Halabi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.