Healthcare-seeking and treatment experiences among women with primary infertility: a cross-sectional community study

Manjula G. Hadagalimath; Renuka E. Asagi

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20264006

Authors

Manjula G. Hadagalimath Department of Studies in Social Work, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Renuka E. Asagi Department of Studies in Social Work, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20264006

Keywords:

Economic, Infertility, Infertility recognition, Psychological, Rural-urban, Type of facilities

Abstract

Background: Primary infertility affects women’s emotional, family life, and may lead seeking continuous treatment. Understanding the healthcare-seeking behaviour and treatment experiences of women help identify the barriers they face. With this intention present study was undertaken to assess socio-demographic associations, recognition of infertility, healthcare access pathways, burdens of infertility care among women with primary infertility across rural and urban communities.

Methods: A community-based, cross-sectional study conducted in Dharwad district of Karnatak during 2025. Total 230 women diagnosed with primary infertility were interviewed. Data were assessed using descriptive and inferential bivariate metrics (χ² analysis) on SPSS software version 20.0.

Results: Socio-demographic characteristics revealed separate residential variations, with significantly high among advanced educated women (44.8% versus 28.9%; p=0.023) and specific salaried patterns observed among urban groups. Rural women presented higher tendencies of child marriage (29.8% versus 22.4%; p=0.001), within consanguineous unions (37.7% versus 19.8%; p=0.003). No significant rural-urban variation observed across treatment paths, frequency of facilities visits, or avoiding public facilities, with 85.7% women heavily dependent on private systems. More than half of the women (53.5%) discontinued treatment due to severe psychological distress (86.2%) and unaffordable medical costs (55.3%).

Conclusions: Though socio-demographic indicators vary across rural and urban residents, the real-world treatment paths, treatment dropouts, psychological and economic distress patterns remain entirely similar. Public welfare policies must integrate low-cost reproductive treatment packages and mandated psychological care and effective counselling services within facilities.

References

Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356.

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1786-801.

Wei Y, Lin Z, Huang Q, Wu H, Wang R, Wang J. Burden of female infertility in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2021: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2025;46(1):2459618.

Cox CM, Thoma ME, Tchangalova N, Mburu G, Bornstein MJ, Johnson CL, et al. Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990 to 2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(4):hoac051.

Uppal L, Bhardwaj N. A community-based approach to identifying reproductive health challenges: the case of Rajasthan. ORF Special Report No. 256. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation; 2025.

Chethana R, Chacko TV, Shilpa. Treatment-seeking pattern among infertile couples in a rural area. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3(10):2884-90.

Tholeti P, Uppangala S, Kalthur G, Adiga SK. The landscape of assisted reproductive technology access in India. Reprod Fertil. 2024;5(4):e240029.

Widge A. Seeking conception: experiences of urban Indian women with in vitro fertilisation. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;59(3):226-33.

Roberts L, Renati S, Solomon S, Montgomery S. Women and infertility in a pronatalist culture: mental health in the slums of Mumbai. Int J Womens Health. 2020;12:993-1003.

Jejeebhoy SJ. Infertility in India: levels, patterns and consequences: priorities for social science research. J Fam Welf. 1998;44(2):15-24.

Padhan AK, Patil P, Vikani A, Sharma D, Sachin O, Somen B, et al. Out-of-pocket expenditure incurred by couples seeking infertility services at tertiary-level facilities in India. Indian J Med Res. 2026;163(5):618-24.

Sharma N, Sharma S, Ghai S, Kaur I, Kaur J, Kaur H. An exploratory study on treatment-seeking behavior and pathways of care followed by couples attending an infertility clinic. Int J Infertil Fetal Med. 2018;9(1-2):1-5.

Kundu S, Ali B, Dhillon P. Surging trends of infertility and its behavioural determinants in India. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0289096.

Gothwal M, Singh P, Agrawal N, Ghuman NK, Yadav G, Gupta MK, et al. The influence of proximate determinants on fertility awareness among women seeking care at an infertility clinic in western India. Indian J Community Med. 2026;51(1):118-23.

Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411-26.

Ombelet W. WHO fact sheet on infertility gives hope to millions of infertile couples worldwide. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2020;12(4):249-51.

International Institute for Population Sciences, ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India: volume I. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021.

Patel A, Sharma PSVN, Kumar P, Binu VS. Sociocultural determinants of infertility stress in patients undergoing fertility treatments. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11(2):172-9.

Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32(1):140-62.

Bhandari L, Dutta S. Health infrastructure in rural India. In: India Infrastructure Report 2007: Rural Infrastructure. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2007:265-285.

Dyer SJ. The value of children in African countries: insights from studies on infertility. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;28(2):69-77.