Role of preoperative sublingual misoprostol in reducing need of analgesia and anaesthesia for gynaecological procedures in rural hospital

Shaveta Gupta, Neema Acharya, C. Hariharan, Sunaina Batra

Abstract


Background: Many of gynaecological procedures require dilatation of cervix which may cause complications like excessive pain, cervical damage, creation of false tract and uterine perforation. Most of these may be done as outpatient procedures, which may reduce anaesthetic complications and decrease hospital stay. Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 which is proven to be effective in cervical priming hence reducing the fore mentioned complications.

Methods: The study was randomized control trial followed a single bind style for two parallel groups. There were two groups, study group (n=100) and control group (n=100). The patients were recruited from the indoor as well as OPD requiring intrauterine procedure (viz D&C, hysteroscopy, HSG). The women of misoprostol group received, 200 microgram of misoprostol sublingualy and the women of placebo group received l mg folic acid 2 hours prior to the intrauterine procedure. Cervical dilatation, time required for the dilatation, cervical resistance, general experience of the patient, side effects, need of anaesthesia and complications were studied.

Results: In present study mean post drug cervical dilatation was 4.08 ± 0.88 in study group which was more than control group 2.08 ± 0.27. It was statistically significant by using student‘t’ test as p value <0.05. It was found that preoperative cervical dilatation was mostly equal in both study group and control group. In the present study it was found that mean time required for cervical dilatation was 36.00 ± 11.19 in study group which was less than in control group 75.50 ± 7.43. It was statistically significant by using ‘t’ test as p value <0.05. Cervical dilatation was required in 25% women in study group and 100% in control group. Anaesthesia was required in 25% women in study group and 100% in control group. Side effects regarding bleeding after post drug cervical dilatation in study group were statistically different as compared to control group. No complications were present in present study.

Conclusions: Misoprostol PGE1 is commercially widely available, safe and cost effective drug which can be used as a cervical ripening/priming agent before all the gynaecological procedures in non-pregnant women as it increases the cervical dilatation and decreases the need of analgesia or anaesthesia.


Keywords


Misoprostol, Sublingual, Cervical priming

Full Text:

PDF

References


Weeks AD, Alfirevic Z, Faundes A, Hofmeyr J, Safar P, Wing D. Misoprostol for induction of labour with a live fetus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Suppl. 2007;99:S194-7.

Ngai SW, Chan YM, Liu KL, Ho PC. Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11): 2373-5.

El-Refaey H, Calder L, Wheatley DN, Templeton A. Cervical priming with prostaglandin E1 analogues, misoprostol and gemeprost. Lancet. 1994;343(8907):1207-9.

Ngai SW, Chan YM, Tang OS, Ho PC. The use of misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(8):2139-42.

World Health Organization. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. In: WHO, eds. WHO Guidance. Geneva: WHO; 2003.

Hunt JN, Smith JL, Jiang CL, Kessler L. Effect of synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog on aspirin-induced gastric bleeding and secretion. Dig Dis Sci. 1983 Oct;28(10):897-902.

Aronsson A, Helström L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol for cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized comparison. Contraception. 2004a;69:165-9.

Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC. Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:332-6.

Aronsson A, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Effects of misoprostol on uterine contractility following different routes of administration. Hum Reprod. 2004b;19:81-4.

Shyama Prasad Saha, Nabendu Bhattacharjee, Gangotri Baru. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before gynecological procedures on non-pregnant women. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2007;1(2):185-93.

Bansal S, Kanwar S, Kaur A, Nautiyal R, Chaturvedi J. Misoprostol for cervical priming on non-pregnant uterus. Internet J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;11(1):1-5.

Anita Kant, Divyakumar, Usha Priyambada. A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. J Midlife Health. 2011 Jan-Jun;2(1):25-7.

Suk Wai Ngai, Yik Ming Chan, Ka Lai Liuand Pak Chung Ho. Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2373-5.