Clinicohistopathological correlation of hysterectomy in rural India: an observational study

Kumud Gupta, Meennal Parmar

Abstract


Background: Hysterectomy - abdominal or vaginal or laparoscopic assisted, hysterectomy is the most commonly performed elective major gynaecological surgery. Rate of hysterectomy has varied between 6.1 and 8.6/1000 women of all ages. The abdominal removal of the uterus is called ‘total abdominal hysterectomy’ while the removal of the uterus by the vaginal route is termed as ‘vaginal hysterectomy’. The supracervical removal of the uterus is termed as ‘subtotal hysterectomy’. As compared to a higher frequency of hysterectomy (10-20%) in other countries, a lower rate (4-6%) has been reported in India.

Methods: The study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology National Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Jaipur in 2013-2014. 100 patients were undergoing hysterectomy. The patients were diagnosed on the basis of history, clinical examination and ultrasonography report.

Results: In our study, maximum number of clinical diagnosis made, were of DUB (with PID and Prolapse) which was 35%. This was followed by leiomyoma i.e. 29%, clinically 29 cases were diagnosed of which 24 were histopathologically proven. Adenomyosis (10%), clinically 10 cases were identified but there were 15 cases histopathologically, this can be due to different clinical presentation. Clinically diagnosed cases of carcinoma endometrium and cervical erosions were 1% and 2% respectively. Overall sensitivity for clinical diagnosis in our study was 52%. The most common histopathological finding was leiomyoma (24%), followed by adenomyosis (15%) and chronic cervicitis (15%). Other pathologies include combined adenomyosis and leiomyoma (6%), benign ovarian cyst in four cases. Normal histopathological report was obtained in 32 cases. Maximum correlation (100%) was found with cancer cervix, cancer ovary and cancer endometrium.

Conclusions: Hysterectomy still remains the widely used modality in developing as well as developed countries. Every hysterectomy specimen should be subjected to histopathological examination to ensure diagnosis and thus management in particular of malignant diseases.

Keywords


Total abdominal hysterectomy, Subtotal hysterectomy, Laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy, Leiomyoma, Adenomyosis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Katz VL, Leutz GM, Lobo RA, Gershensen DM. The uterus and menstruation. In: Katz VL, Leutz GM, Lobo RA, Gershensen DM, eds. Comprehensive Gynecology. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007: 436-449.

Peric H, Fraser IS. The symptomatology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;20(4):547-55.

Shergill SK, Shergill HK, Gupta M, Kaur S. Clinicopathological study of hysterectomies. J Indian Med Assoc. 2002 Apr;100(4):238-9, 246.

Zille Huma, Naeem A, Shoaib M, Fayyaz S, Arjumand. A clinicopathological review of elective hysterectomies in Sir Ganga Ram hospital. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2012 Oct-Dec;6(4):970-2.

Perveen S, Tayyab S. A clinicopathological review of elective abdominal hysterectomy. J Surg Pak (Int). 2008 Jan-Mar;13(1):26-9.

Neena Y, Honey B. Clinico-pathological correlation of hysterectomy specimens for abnormal uterine bleeding in rural area. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013 Sep;39(2):7506-12.

Abdullah LS. Hysterectomy: a clinicopathologic correlation. Bahrain Med Bull. 2006 Jun;28:2.

Mahmoud Khaniki, Mahsa Shojaie, Azam M. Tarafdari. Histopathological study of hysterectomy operations in a University clinic in Tehran from 2005 to 2009. J Fam Reprod Health. 2011;5(2):51-5.