DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150052

Relationship and effect of duration of first stage of labor on second stage

Leena MN, Muralidhar V. Pai, Vidyashree G. Poojari

Abstract


Background: Objective: To evaluate the relationship and effect of first stage of labor on second stage.

Methods: It was a prospective, observational study. A total of 132 subjects with cephalic presentation at or from 4 cm dilatation with or without intact membrane were included in the study. Women with more than 4 cm dilation were excluded from the study. The duration and complications of second stage were correlated with the duration of first stage.

Results: Out of 132 subjects, duration of labor was less than 3 hours in 79 subjects of which 52 (65.8%) had shorter (less than 30 minutes) second stage. The duration of first stage was between 6 and 9 hours in 10 subjects of which 9 (90% had longer (more than 30 minutes) second stage and 4 subjects had first stage lasting more than 9 hours of which 3 (75%) had second stage lasting more than 1 hour. These findings were statistically significant (P = 0.001). As the duration of first stage increased the incidence of instrumental delivery was also increased however this was statistically not significant.

Conclusions: As the duration of first stage increases the duration of second stage and the incidence of instrumental/caesarean delivery increases.


Keywords


Labor, First stage, Second stage

Full Text:

PDF

References


Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6:567-89.

Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Normal labor and delivery. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, eds. Williams’s Obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2010.

Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Relationship of the length of the first stage of labor to the length of the second stage. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):27-32.

Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:824-8.

Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, et al. Consortium on safe labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281-7.

Cohen WR. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:266.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;49:479-85.

Bleich AT, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. An analysis of second-stage labour beyond 3 hours in nulliparous. Am J Perinatol. 2012 Oct;29(9):717-22.

Brain H. Castro, Katheryn M. Nevarez. First and second stages of labor: risk factors, diagnoses, management. Am J Biomed. 2014 Apr;2(4):374-87.

Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:933-8.

Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary caesarean delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) and the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:693-711.

Leighton BL, Halpern SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5 Suppl Nature):S69-77.