DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150080

Contraceptive uptake among women attending family planning clinic in a Nigerian tertiary health facility: a 6 year review

Adebimpe O. Ijarotimi, Babatola Bakare, Olusegun O. Badejoko, Akintunde O. Fehintola, Olabisi M. Loto, Earnest O. Orji, Abiodun S. Adegoke

Abstract


Background: Contraceptive uptake is one of the most important determinants of pregnancy rates and birth rates in the world. Aim: To determine the principal trends in contraceptive use from 2004-2009 in the family planning unit of a tertiary health centre in South-Western Nigeria, and to identify the effect of age, marital status and parity on the choice of contraceptive method.

Methods: The record of 1,862 clients attending the Family Planning unit of Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun-State, Nigeria for the period between 2004-2009 were reviewed. Information related to the age, marital status, parity and the choice of contraception were obtained using a structured proforma and the data analyzed with SPSS version 16. Pearson chi-square test was used as test of significance where applicable.

Results: Within the study period, the contraceptive uptake was 13.2%. Copper-T IUCD was the most commonly used method of contraception (77.9%), followed by the progestogen only injectable contraceptives (12.6%), then oral pills (4.1%) and progestin implants (2.3%). Single women and women of low parity are more likely to use pills than IUCD (69% vs. 38.3%) while long acting reversible contraception (injectables and IUCD) are preferred by women with higher parity (P=0.000).

Conclusions: IUCD is the most popular method of contraception in Ife-Ijesha area of Nigeria. Contraceptive uptake is relatively low among the women. Age and parity are key influences on the uptake and choice of contraception practiced by the women, while the influence of marital status is not statistically significant.


Keywords


Contraception, Choice, Uptake

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adinma JIB, Nwosu BO. Family planning knowledge and practice among women attending an antenatal clinic. Adv Contracep. 1995;11:335-44.

Ntozi JPM, Kabara JB. Family planning in rural Uganda: Knowledge and use of modern and traditional methods in Ankole. Stud Fam Plann. 1991;22:116-23.

Einterz EM. Family planning and tradition: a view from northern Cameroon. World Health Forum. 1994;15:378-81.

Aja GH, Nwangwa MA, Egwu IN. Knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning in rural communities in Nigeria. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1995;8:85-90..

Ukaegbu AO. Family planning attitudes and practices in rural eastern Nigeria. Stud Fam Plann. 1977;8:177-83.

Ventura SV, Mosher WD, Curtin SD, Martin JA, Mathews TJ. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates: estimates for the United States, 1980-1992. Monthly Vital Statistics Report. 1995;43(11 Suppl 2):260.

Westoff CF, Jones EF. Contraception and sterilization in the United States, 1965-1975. Fam Plann Perspect. 1977;1:153-7.

Zelnick M, Kantner JF. Sexual activity, contraceptive use and pregnancy among metropolitan - area teenagers: 1971-1979. Fam Plann Perspect. 1980;12:230-7.

Forrest JD, Henshaw SK. What US women think and do about contraception. Fam Plann Perspect. 1983;15:157-66.

Adeyemi AS, Adekanle DA. Factors influencing the choice of contraceptives among the married women in Osogbo, Western Nigeria. Niger Med Practitioner. 2009;55(4):56-60.

Ogedengbe OK, Giwa-Osagie OF, Ola R, Fasan MO. Contraceptive choice in an urban clinic in Nigeria. J Biosoc Sci. 1987;19:89-95.

Cameroon. Demographic and health survey (D.H.S), 1991. A Survey. B. P. 7094 Yaounde, Cameroon: National Department of the Second General Population and Housing Census (2nd GPHC); 1992.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2005. In: UN, eds. Publication ST/ESA/SER. A/253. New York: United Nations; 2006.

Foran TM. New contraceptive choices across reproductive life. Med J Aust. 2003;178:616-20.

Herbert B, Peterson HB, Curtis KM. Contraception. In: James R. Scott, Ronald S. Gibbs, Beth Y. Karlan, Arthur F. Haney, eds. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 2003: 37.

Mishell DR. Intrauterine devices: mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy. Contraception. 1998;58:545-53.

Chigbu B, Onwere S, Aluka C, Kamanu C, Okoro O, Feyi-Waboso P. Contraceptive choices of women in rural southeastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13:195-9.

Mutihir JT, Pam VC. Overview of contraceptive use in Jos University teaching hospital, North Central Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11:139-43.

Adeyemi AS, Adekanle DA. Pattern of contraceptive choice among the married women attending the family planning clinic of a tertiary health institution. Niger J Med. 2008;17:67-70.

Hubacher D, Lara-Ricalde R, Taylor DJ, Guerra-Infante F, Guzmán-Rodríguez R. Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:561-7.

Lete I, Morales P, De Pablo JL. Use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in nulliparous women: personal experience over a 12-year period. Eur J. Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1998;3:190-3.