A clinical study of association of maternal height and estimated foetal weight on mode of delivery
Keywords:Maternal height, Estimated foetal weight, Mode of delivery
Background: Maternal height and antenatal estimated fetal weight can affect mode of delivery. The aims and objective of this study were to study the association between the mode of delivery and maternal height and estimated foetal weight.
Methods: 240 full term primigravida women without any obstetric and medical complications who were admitted in Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital Wardha for delivery were randomly selected for study. After delivery 138 women who underwent caesarean delivery formed the study group and 102 women who underwent vaginal delivery formed control group. These two groups were compared for their maternal heights and antenatal estimated foetal weight (by Johnson’s formula).
Results: In present study (1) Mean height of women in study group was 147 cm while that in control group was 155 cm. (2) Out of 49 short statured women (height ≤ 145 cm) 47 (95.91%) had emergency caesarean section and 2(4.08%) women were delivered vaginally. (3) Estimated foetal weight in study group was 2956 grams while that in control group was 2845 grams.
Conclusions: We conclude that short statured women with larger baby size has higher incidence of emergency caesarean delivery.
Vijayalaxmi KG, Urooj A. Influence of maternal factors on mode of delivery and birth weight in urban pregnant women. J Hum Ecol. 2009;25(2):133-6.
AbouZahr C, Royston E, eds. In: Maternal Mortality: a fact book, Geneva: WHO, N0 348, Update May 2014.
Thompson AM. Maternal stature and reproductive efficiency. Eugenics Review. 1959;51:157-62.
Bernard RM. The shape and size of female pelvis. Edin Med J. 1952:59:1-15.
James DK, Chiswick ML. Kielland’s: role of ante natal factors in prediction of use BMJ. 1979;1:10-1.
Dougherty CRS, Jones AD. Obstetric management and out come related to maternal characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988:158:470-4.
Thomson M, Hanley J. Factors predisposing to difficult labour in primiparas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1074-8.
Parsons MT, Winegar A, Siefert L, Spellacy WN. Pregnancy out comes in short women J Reprod Med. 1989:34:357-61.
Tsu VD. Matemal height and age: risk factors for cephalo pelvic disproportion in Zimbabwe. Int J Epi. 1992;21:941-6.
Harrison KA. Predicting trends in operative delivery for cephalopelvic disproportion in Africa. Lancet. 1990;335:861.
Johnson RW. Calculations in estimating fetal weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1957;74:929.
Loeffler FE. Clinical fetal weight prediction. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonow. 1967;74:675-7.
Ong HC, Sen DK. Clinical estimation of fetal weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:877-80.
Merchant KM, Villar J, Kestler E. Maternal height and newborn size relative to risk of intrapartum caesarean delivery and perinatal distress. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001;108:689-96.
Frank K. “Effect - Height- Weight- Pregnancy- Newborn”, Monogram, 1963.
Desai P, Hazra M, Trivedi LB. Pregnancy outcome in short statured women. J Indian Med Asso. 1989;32-s4.
Baird D. Environmental and Obstetrical factors in prematurity with special reference to experience in Aberdeen. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1962;26:291-5.
Tripathi M, Chaudhary P. Fetomaternal outcome in relation to maternal height among primigravidas. Journal of Gandaki Medical College – Nepal. 2009;2(4):18–23.
Nourah H. Al Qahtani, Salha Al Ganmi, Asma Badran. The risk of cesarean delivery in short Saudi women. International journal of clinical Medicine. 2012;3:238-41.