Concurrent bilateral ectopic pregnancy: a rarity


  • Prabhleen Kaur Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Urvashi Miglani Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • V. K. Kadam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Poonam Laul Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, India



Concurrent, bilateral, Ectopic, Pregnancy


Bilateral ectopic pregnancy is a rare twin gestation with only a few cases reported in the literature. We report a 30 year old woman without any high risk factor for ectopic pregnancy, who had concurrent bilateral ectopic pregnancy. A 30 year old female presented to the Gynecology emergency department complaining of vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. The presumptive diagnosis of ruptured left sided ectopic pregnancy was made on basis of clinical findings and ultrasound finings. An emergency laparotomy was done revealed a hemoperitoneum of 1.5 liters, a ruptured left tubal pregnancy with active bleeding and right tubal un-ruptured ectopic was found. A bilateral salpingectomy was performed. Histopathology confirmed presence of chorionic villi in both tubes. In theory, laparoscopic salpingostomy is the best surgical approach in bilateral tubal pregnancy. However, bilateral salpingectomy may be necessary when both tubes are extensively damaged or are actively bleeding. Successful pregnancies have been reported after conservative surgical treatment of bilateral ectopic, but the risk of recurrence is high. Our decision for an emergency laparotomy followed by bilateral salpingectomy was based on the fact that the patient presented with acute abdomen and was haemodynamically unstable and there was extensive bilateral tubal damage. As the incidence of ectopic pregnancies is increasing concurrently with the incidences of pelvic inflammatory disease and use of assisted fertility techniques; it may be that these “rare ectopics” will become less uncommon.


Barnhart K, Sammel M, Gracia C. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility 2006;(1):36–43.

Basly M, Archour R, Aissa I. Extra-Uterine Twin Pregnancy. Case Report of Spontaneous Bilateral Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. The Internet Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2012;16(2):33-4.

Greenberg J. Bilateral Ectopic Pregnancy. Review Obstetrics Gynaecology. 2008;1(2):48.

Grimes D. Estimation of pregnancy-related morality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States 1991 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(1):22-4.

92-94.Shenoy J, Choudhary V, Giles R. Bilateral ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecology. 2005;25:612-3.

Fishback, H., Bilateral simultaneous tubal pregnancy. Canadian medical associated journal 1953;68(4):397-81.

Norris, S., Bilateral simultaneous tubal pregnancy. Canadian Medical Associate Journal. 1953;68: 379-81.

Andrews J, Farrell S. Spontaneous bilateral tubal pregnancies: a case report. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2008;30(1):51-4.

Martinez J, Ana C, Gonzalez M, Gil O, Farrer M , Romero J. Bilateral Simultaneous Ectopic Pregnancy. Southern Medical Journal 2009;102(10):1055-7.

Himangini B, Behera R, Sachdev S. Spontaneous bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy. Pravara Med Rev 2010;(1):19-21.

Ryan M, Saldana B: Bilateral ectopic pregnancy: A tale of caution. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1160-3.

Bangsgaard N. Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrical and Gynaecology, 2003;110:765-70.






Case Reports