DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150736

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: a retrospective study

Jayashree S., Virupaksha Ajjammanavar, Amrutha B.

Abstract


Background: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is now emerging as a safe procedure even in patients suitable for vaginal hysterectomy (VH) due to its advantages like better visualisation, less post-operative pain and shorter hospital stay. This study was done to compare the duration of surgery, intra-operative and postoperative complications, hospital stay and post-operative analgesia requirement in TLH and VH.

Methods: A retrospective study of women undergoing TLH and VH between June 2013 and September 2014 in JSS Hospital, Mysore was done. Patients with suspected genital malignancy and uterine prolapse were excluded. Baseline characteristics like age, BMI, parity, indication for hysterectomy, uterine size and previous pelvic surgeries were noted. Intra-operative and post-operative parameters like duration of surgery, complications, post-operative analgesic dosage and hospital stay were compared between the two surgeries and the results were analysed using Chi square test and independent t test.

Results: The mean time taken to perform TLH was significantly longer, i.e. 113.46 minutes compared with VH, i.e. 61.18 minutes ( p <0.0001). But the duration of stay in the hospital was shorter for the women undergoing TLH, mean duration being 3.74 days as opposed to 5.85 days in women undergoing VH  (p<0.0001). Also, women undergoing VH required more analgesic doses (mean 1.79) than those undergoing TLH (mean 1.36). When we studied the rate of complications in both the groups, we found no statistically significant difference.

Conclusions: TLH was as safe as VH and had advantages like shorter hospital stay and reduced analgesia dose. 


Keywords


Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy, Hospital stay, Post-operative analgesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cristina Nogueira-Silva, Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, Sónia Barata, Conceição Alho, Filipa Osorio, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy: Retrospective analysis of 262 cases Acta Med Port 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):73-81.

Morton M, Cheung VY, Rosenthal DM. Total laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy: a retrospective comparison. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:1039-44.

V Dacosta, A MCIntosh et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy at the university hospital of the West Indies: a 5 year retrospective study. West Indian Medical Journal. Vol 61; No 9 Mona dez.2012.

Falcone T, Walters M. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:753-67.

Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Have J, Napp V, Abbott J et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 2004;328:129.

Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BJ, Kluivers KB . Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseases. Cochrane review 1 September 2015.

Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG. 2009;116:492-500.

Donnez O, Donnez J. A series of 400 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease: a single centre, single surgeon prospective study of complications confirming previous retrospective study. BJOG.2010;117:752-5.

Karaman Y, Bingol B, Günenç Z. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:78-84.

Bojahr B, Raatz D, Schonleber G, Abri C, Ohlinger R. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:183-9.

Schindlbeck C, Klauser K, Dian D, Janni W, Friese K. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;277:331-7.

Kim HB, Song JE, Kim GH, Cho HY, Lee KY. Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010;36: 656-60.

Candiani M, Izzo S, Bulfoni A, Riparini J, Ronzoni S, Marconi A. Laparoscopic vs. vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:368.e1-7.

Rasha G, Colin A. Walsh, Stewart R. Walsh, Emmanuel Karantanis. Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(5):388.e1-388.e8

Neil Johnson, David Barlow, Anne Lethaby, Emma Tvender, Liz Curr, Ray Garry. Methods of hysterectomy: systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.

Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, Siesto G, Serati M, Bogani G et al. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:118.e1-8.

Nascimento MC, Kelley A, Martitsch C, Weidner I, Obermair A. Postoperative analgesic requirements – total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;45:140–3.

Kong-Ju Choi, Hong-Bae Kim, Sung-Ho Park. The comparison of postoperative pain: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;55(6):384-91.

Raxita Patel, Nisha Chakravarty. Comparative study of laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3 (3): 335-7.