Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding: role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and its correlation with histopathology
Keywords:
Diagnostic hysteroscopy, Abnormal uterine bleeding, Dilatation and curettage, Dysfunctional uterine bleedingAbstract
Background: The objective was to assess the accuracy of diagnostic hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and to correlate hysteroscopic findings with histopathology reports.
Methods: A prospective study was carried out at our institute from January 2010 to December 2013. Ninety cases were included in this study. Patients’ age varied from 20 to 60. Those women with the history of abnormal uterine bleeding were admitted. In all cases diagnostic hysteroscopic examination and dilatation and curettage were carried out. Endometrium was sent for histopathology and correlation of hysteroscopic findings with histopathology reports was studied.
Results: Various findings on hysteroscopy are as following: proliferative endometrium 36.66%, secretary endometrium 17.77% endometrial hyperplasia 24.44%, atrophic endometrium 5.55%, endometrial polyp 8.88%, submucous fibroid 4.44%, and endometrial carcinoma 2.22%.
Conclusions: Hysteroscopy is an eye in uterus and it provides more accurate diagnosis than dilatation and curettage alone in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
References
Emanuel MH, Verdel MJC, Stas H, Wamsteker K, Lammes FB. An audit of true prevalence of intra-uterine pathology: the hysteroscopical findings controlled for patient selection in 1202 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Gynecol Endosc. 1995;4:237-41.
Gimpelson RJ, Rappold HO. A comparative study between panoramic hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dialatation and curettage: a review of 276 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:489-92.
Soguktas S, Cogendez E, Kayatas SE, Asoglu MR, Selcuk S, Ertekin A. Comparison of saline infusion sonohysterography and hysteroscopy in diagnosis of premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repro Biol. 2012;161(1):66-70.
Panda A, Parulekar SV, Gupta A. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and histopathological correlation. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1999;49:74-6.
Loverro G, Bettocchi S, Cormio G, Nicolardi V, Porreca MR, Pansini N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy in endometrial hyperplasia. Maturitas. 1996;25:187-91.
Arslan S, Aytan H, Gunyeli I, Koi O, Tuncay G, Tapisiz OL. Office hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrium: Can we hit the target. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;271:200-2.
Valle RF. Hysteroscopic evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;153:521-6.
Sheth S, Hamper VM, Kurman R. A study between hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dialatation and curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;158:489.
Acharya V, Mehta S, Randar A. Evaluation of dysfunctional uterine bleeding by TVS, hysteroscopy and histopathology. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2003;53:170-7.
Haller H, Maechjcic N, Rukarina B, Krasevic M, Rupcic S, Mozetic D. Transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;54:155-9.
Mencaglia L. Hysteroscopy and adenocarcinoma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995;22:573-9.
Litta P, Merlin F, Saccardi C, Pozzan C, Sacco G, Fracas M, et al. Role of hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy to rule out endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Maturitas. 2005;50:117-23.
Menon MKK, Devi PK, Rao KB. Hysteroscopy: intrauterine pathologies. In: Menon MKK, Devi PK, Rao KB, eds. Postgraduate Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1st ed. India: Orient Longman; 1982: 253.