Clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation of PPIUCD
Keywords:FTVD, LSCS, PPIUCD, Post-partum
Background: India is the second most populated country in the world. Effective contraception with low complication rates and high continuation rate in post-partum period can check population growth.
Methods: This is a prospective study carried out at Mahatma Gandhi Hospital after ethical committee approval. 100 patients giving the informed consent were taken in the study. PPIUCD inserted in patients and they were followed up at 48 hrs, 6 weeks and 12 weeks by clinical examination and USG.
Results: In this study, with PPIUCD insertion during LSCS, the expulsion and removal was observed in 4% and 14% whereas in cases with FTVD 8.33% expulsion and 12.5% removal were observed. 82% and 79.2% continued the use of PPIUCD in LSCS and FTVD respectively. The most common complain of the patients with PPIUCD were irritation because of thread. No case of pelvic infection or perforation was observed. There was no expulsion of PPIUCD when the distance of PPIUCD from fundus on USG was <10 mm.
Conclusion: PPIUCD have high continuation rates with low complication rate. Distance of PPIUCD from fundus on USG is not a good indicator for predicting expulsion of PPIUCD.
Post-partum IUCD reference manual. New Delhi: Family Planning Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010.
Borda M. Family Planning Needs during the Extended Postpartum Period in India. Access Family Planning Initiative Brief, 2009.
Garuda L, Kambham S, Neelohita. Clinical outcome of PPIUCD (Copper-380A)-intracaesarean insertion Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;2(4):218-26.
Malathi P, Patalay K. Intra cesarean-intra uterine contraceptive device 380 a insertion: 3 years experience at a tertiary care center. IAIM. 2016;3(8):241-7.
Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, Charurat E. Women’s experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India. Reproduc Health 2014,11:32.
Gupta A, Verma A, Chauhan J. Evaluation of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380A) insertion in a teaching hospital of Western U.P. Int J Reproduc Contracep Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2:204-8.
Shukla M, Qureshi, S Chandravati, Post-placental intrauterine device insertion. A 5 years’ experience at a tertiary case centre in north India. Indian J med Res. 2012;136(3):432-5.
Sujnanendra M. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(5):337-43.
Kittur S International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2012;1(1):26-32.
Şevki Çelen S, Ayhan Sucak, Yasemin Yıldız, Nuri Danışman. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section. Contraception. 2011;84:240-3.
Hooda R, Mann S, Nanda S, Gupta A, More H, Bhutani J. Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertions in Caesarean and Vaginal Deliveries: A Comparative Study of Follow-Up Outcomes. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;2016.
Tatum HJ, Beltran RS, Ramos R, Van Kets H, Sivin I, Schmidt FH, Ortho-McNeil I. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(5):1231-5.
Araujo VB, Ortiz L, Smith J: Postpartum IUD in Paraguay: a case series of 3000 cases. Contracep. 2012,86:173-86
Gautam R, Arya KN, Kharakwal S, Singh S, Trivedi M. Overview of immediate PPIUCD application in Bundelkhand region. J Evol Med Dental Sci. 2014;3(36):9518-26.
Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program and PPFP activities, WHO Report.
Goyal N. Post placental intrauterine contraceptive device-an ultrasound guided follow up study. Indian J App Res. 2015;5(6):454:6.