A study to evaluate gestational age with the help of placental thickness

Authors

  • Aditi Tiwari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SBKS Medical Institute and Research Centre, Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Kavita Chandnani Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SBKS Medical Institute and Research Centre, Piparia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Keywords:

Placental thickness, Gestational age

Abstract

Background: To assess relationship of placental thickness with gestational age.

Methods: The study was conducted on 754 normal antenatal patients, of all gestational ages attending the out patient department of Dhiraj hospital from October 2012 to March 2013. USG was done by using Philips HD 7machine with a 3.75 MHz sector probe. After estimating the fetal age by CRL, BPD, HC, AC, and FL, the placental thickness with standard deviation was calculated for all gestational ages.

Results: It was observed that the placental thickness gradually increased from 15 mm at 11 weeks of gestation to 36.3 mm at 39 weeks. From the 22nd week to the 35th week of gestation the placental thickness coincide almost exactly with the gestational age in weeks.

Conclusion: Placental thickness is a good parameter for estimation of gestational age especially in the late second trimester and early third trimester. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anupama J, Ganesh K, Agrawal U, Khakharwal S (2001). Placental thickness: a sonographic indicator of gestational age. J obst. Gyne. Indian 51(3): 48-49.

Hoddick WK, Mahony BS, Callen PW, Filly RA (1985). Placental thickness. J. Ultra Med. 4(9): 479- 482.

Jauniaux E, Ramsay B, Campbell S (1994). Ultrasonographic investigation of placental morphologic characteristics and size during the second trimester of pregnancy. Am. J. obst. Gyn. 160(1 pt1): 130-137.

Journal of clinical diagnosis and research, 2012 December; 6(10): 1732–1735.

Kunlmann RS, Warsof S. Ultrasound of the placenta Clinical African Journal Obstetric& Gynecology 1996; 39:34.

Malhotra N, Kumar P. Ultrasound in Obstetrics andGynaecology. 3rd ed. Mumbai: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Private Ltd; 1999. Chapter 11, Measurement of foetal parameters; Chapter 27, Ultrasound and admission test in labour. Chapter 55, Pitfalls in USG;pp92-98,198-200,386-88.

Mathai Betty M, Singala Subhash C, NittalaPramod P, Chakravarti RajeshJ, Toppo Julius N, J. of obstetrics and gyanaecology of India 2013 march12.

Mital P, Pooja N, Mehndriatta K (2002). Placental thickness: a sonograpgic parameter of estimating gestational age of the foetus. Indian journal of radiol. Imaging 12: 553-554.

Nyberg DA, Finberg HJ. The placenta, placental membranes and umbilical cord. Journal on diagnostic ultrasound of foetal anomalies. 1990;21(4):623–75.

Sadler TW (2004).Langman’s medical embryology 11th edition. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins p 112- 91.

Wolfson RN, Zador IE, Havorsen P, Andrews B, Sokol RJ. Biparietal diameter in premature rupture of membranes: Errors in estimating gestational age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1983;11:371-74.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-13

How to Cite

Tiwari, A., & Chandnani, K. (2016). A study to evaluate gestational age with the help of placental thickness. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(4), 503–505. Retrieved from https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/230

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles