Role of saline infusion sonography in abnormal uterine bleeding

Authors

  • Megha Sharma Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Shubham Joshi Department of Medicine, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Akash Sharma Department of Pediatrics, Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  • Oby Nagar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Rakesh Khuteta Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Meenu Bagarahatta Department of Radiodiagnosis, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Keywords:

Efficacy, SIS, AUB, Crooke’s, Hysteroscopy

Abstract

Background: To describe the diagnostic efficacy of Saline Infusion Sonography(SIS) in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding(AUB).

Methods: This is a hospital based observational descriptive study conducted in 121 women visiting the OPD with complain of AUB in any form, between September 2011-August 2012. SIS was done using Crooke’s cannula followed by Diagnostic Hysteroscopy(DH) the following day. Results obtained were analysed.

Results: 61% of the cases of AUB were diagnosed to have some abnormality by hysteroscopy as compared to 51 % by SIS. The sensitivity of SIS was greatest(100%) for Mullerian anomalies, 75% for endometrial hyperplasia, 69% for endometrial polyps, 68.75% for submucous myomas and 66.67% for endometritis. The specificity was greatestfor endometrial hyperplasia and adhesions(100%), 99% for submucous myomas, 98.3% for endometritis, 95.7% for endometrial polyps and mullerian anomalies. It had a 100% positive predictive value for endometrial hyperplasia, 92% and 83% for submucous myomas and endometrial polyps respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of SIS in our setting was67.56% and 93.6% respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of SIS for Endometrial hyperplasia, Endometritis, Endometrial Polyps, Mullerian abnormalities, Submucus fibroid and Adhesions was 96.69%, 97.53%,89.25%,95.86%,95.04% and 98.34% respectively.

Conclusions: We found Saline Infusion Sonography to be an easy and safe procedure, though being less sensitive, it cannot replace hysteroscopy as a whole. Though hysteroscopy is a gold standard, saline infusion sonography is an easy, safe procedure for diagnosing intracavitary pathologies in low resource setting and despite being less sensitive, it can still reduce the number of hysteroscopies.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Richman et al., Fallopian tube patency as assessed by ultrasonogram following fluid injection. Rad. 1984;152:507-510.

Aslam M, Ijaz L, Tariq S, Shafqat K, Meher-Un-Nisa, Ashraf R, Kazmi T. Comparison of transvaginal sonography and saline contrast sonohysterography in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: correlation with hysteroscopy and histopathology. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2007 Jan;1(1):17-24.

Epstein E, Ramirez A, et al. Transvaginal sonography, saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with abnormal bleeding and endometrium >5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001 Aug;18(2):157-62.

Valenzano MM, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Fortunato T, Costantini S, RagniN.The value of sonohysterography in detecting intracavitary benign abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Oct;272(4):265-8.

Grigoris F. Grimbizis, EftychiaAnagnostou, EfstratiosAsimakopoulos, PanagiotisStamatopoulos, Basil C. TarlatzisPapageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece “A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of endometrial pathology” Fertility and Sterility 2010.

Krampl E; Bourne T; hurlen-Solbakken H; Istre O. Transvaginal Ultrasonography, sonohysterography and operative hysteroscopy for the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scandinavia 2001 Jul;80(7):616-22.

Bernard JP, et al. Saline contrast sonohysterography as first-line investigation for women with uterine bleeding. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997;19121-5.

Epstein E; Ramirez A, et al.Transvaginal sonography, saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with abnormal bleeding and endometrium >5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001 Aug;18(2):157-62.

Wildrich T, Bradley LD, Mitchinson AR Collins RL. Comparison of saline infusion sonography with office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;174(4):1327-34.

Lynne Rogerson, Jane Bates, Mike Weston, Sean Duffy. A comparision of outpatient hysteroscopy with saline infusion hysterosonography. BJOG, July 2002.

Shikha Pasrija, Shubha Sagar Trivedi, Mahinder Kaur Narula.Prospective study of saline infusion sonohysterography in evaluation of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2004;30(1):27-33.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-13

How to Cite

Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Sharma, A., Nagar, O., Khuteta, R., & Bagarahatta, M. (2016). Role of saline infusion sonography in abnormal uterine bleeding. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(4), 533–538. Retrieved from https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/237

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles