DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170565

Prediction of caesarean section for arrest of descent during the second stage of labour

Sunil Kumar Samal, Setu Rathod

Abstract


Background: Friedman described the normal progress of labor in different curves for nulliparous and multiparous women in 1954. Any deviation from these curves during the second stage of labor is considered as failure to progress in the second stage of labor. The aim of the study is to define obstetrical risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labour.

Methods: All singleton, vertex, term deliveries with an unscarred uterus, between December 2013 to November 2016 (3 years) were included. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to investigate independent risk factors associated with arrest of descent during the second stage of labor.

Results: The study included 7260 deliveries, of these 163 (3.3%) were complicated with arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Using a multivariable analysis, the following obstetric risk factors were found to be significantly associated with arrest of descent: primigravida (RR=7.8, 95% CI=6.9-8.7, p<0.001), obesity (RR=1.8, 95% CI=1.6-2.0, p<0.001), short stature (RR=2.3, 95% CI=1.9-2.8, p<0.001), hypertensive disorders(RR=1.5, 95% CI=1.3-1.8,p<0.001), gestational diabetes(RR=1.5, 95%  CI=1.2-1.8, p<0.001), free floating head before labour(RR=3.4, 95%CI=2.5-4.1, p<0.001), Occipito-posterior position(RR=3.3, 95% CI=2.1-4.5, p<0.002), Prelabour rupture of membrane (PROM) (RR=1.3, 95% CI=1.0-1.6, p<0.02), induction of labour (RR=2.2, 95% CI=1.0-3.4, p<0.03)  and birth weight>3.5 kg (RR=2.2, 95% CI=2.0-2.4, p<0.001). Deliveries complicated by arrest of descent resulted in cesarean section in 67% and 34% vaginal delivery.

Conclusions: In this era of increased public awareness and medicolegal events it is very crucial to assess and evaluate every woman in labor and to identify in advance the possibility of arrest in advanced labor so that a timely obstetric intervention possibly Cesarean section can prevent unnecessary maternal- fetal complications.

Keywords


Arrest of descent, Caesarean section, Risk factors, Second stage labour

Full Text:

PDF

References


Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68:1568- 75.

Byrne MB, Keane D, Boylan P, Stronge JM. Intrauterine pressure and the active management of labor. J Obstet Gynecol.1993;13:453-6.

Olah KSJ. Failure to progress in the management of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.1994;101:1-3.

Cardozo LD, Gibb DMF, Studd JWW, Vasant RV, Cooper DJ. Predictive value of cervimetric labor patterns in primigravidae. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.1982; 89:33-8.

Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth J. Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 h. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:323-8.

Neuhoff D, Burke MS, Porreco RP. Cesarian birth for failed progress in labor. Obstet Gynecol.1989; 73:915-20.

Handa VL, Laros RK. Active-phase arrest in labor: predictors of cesarean delivery in nulliparous population. Obstet Gynecol.1993; 81:758-63.

Feinstein U, Sheiner E, Levy A, Hallak M, Mazor M. Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77(1):7-14.

Harper DM, Johnson CA, Harper WH, Liese BS. Prenatal predictors of cesarean section due to labor arrest. Arch Gynecol Obstet.1995;256:67-74.