DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172306

Uterine ruptures during labor: a study of 26 cases at Nabil Choucair Medical Center, in the suburbs of Dakar

Omar Gassama, Mouhamadou Mansour Niang, Abdoul Aziz Diouf, Youssoupha Toure, Aissatou Mbodji, Marie Edouard Faye Dieme, Philippe Marc Moreira, Jean Charles Moreau

Abstract


Background: This study aims to clarify the epidemiological profile of patients and describe the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic aspects of uterine ruptures at Nabil Choucair Health Center, in the suburbs of Dakar.

Methods: This was a retrospective and prospective, descriptive and analytical study conducted over a period of 112 months, from July 31, 2005 and March 31, 2015; it concerned all diagnosed cases with uterine rupture, managed at Nabil Health Center Choucair Dakar. Data were collected from antenatal notebooks, delivery records, surgical reports and anesthetic records. The following parameters were studied: socio-demographic characteristics (frequency, chracteristics of patient), the course of pregnancy, diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic aspects. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 11.0).

Results: During the study period, we recorded 26 uterine ruptures from a total of 34,097 deliveries, that is a frequency of 8 out of 10,000 births. The epidemiological profile of the patients was that of a 30-year old woman, on average, few previous deliveries with an average parity of 3, who received on average 3 antenatal and evacuated in 50% of cases. Uterine rupture occurred in 17 patients on a new uterus (65, 4%) and in 9 patients on a scarred uterus (34.6%). Two patients (7%) were in hemorrhagic shock. A laparotomy aimed at specifying the place of rupture and making the treatment was performed in all patients. It was 18 uterine segmento-corporeal ruptures (69.2%), 5 segmental ruptures (19.2%) and 2 corporeal ruptures (7.6%). We recorded 9 uterine ruptures with living fetus (38.5%). Twenty-three patients (88.5%) underwent conservative suture against only 3 hemostasis hysterectomy (11.5%). The postoperative courses were uneventful in 57.7% of cases. Eleven patients (42.3%) had anemia and we recorded maternal deaths, which is a maternal mortality of 3.84%.

Conclusions: Uterine rupture is a serious complication that is still responsible for significant maternal and fetal mortality. Prevention is based on careful monitoring of pregnancy and delivery.


Keywords


Conservative suture, Hemostasis hysterectomy, Uterine rupture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Koné M, Diarra S. Uterine rupture during pregnancy. EMC. Obstetrics.. 2008;5-080-A-10.

Merger R, Levy J, Melchior. Precis of Obstetrics. 6th ed. Masson, Paris, 1995;348-53.

Boulanger JC. Uterus scarring and childbirth. In: National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Updates in gynecology and obstetrics. Diffusion Vigot. Paris. 1984;203-35.

Cassignol C, Rudigoz RC. Pregnancy and uterus cicatriciel.Encycl Med Chir Obstét. 2003;(1)5-016-D-20.

Maria B, Cornet MC. Uterine rupture during pregnancy. In: Encycl Med Chir (Ed.) Obstetrics. 05-080-A10 Paris. 1981;6.

Eden RD, Parker RT, Gall SA, Bretones S. Rupture of the pregnent uterus: a 53 years review. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:671-4.

Cazenave JC, Breda JY, Belier L, Nicoloso E, Courbil LJ. Uterine ruptures in Black Africa. A problem still topical. Results of a retrospective survey of 453 cases in six inter-tropical Black Africa centers. Surgery. 1988;114: 76-82.

Cissé CT, Faye EO, De Bernis l, Diadhiou F. Uterine rupture in Senegal: Epidemiology and quality of care. Med trop. 2002:62:619-22.

Akotionga M, Lankoande J, Gue MJ, Kone B. Uterine rupture in maternity at CHN-YO Epidemiological and clinical aspects. Medicine of Black Africa. 1998;45:(8/9).

Gueye SM, Moreau JC, Moreira PM. And Coll. Uterine rupture in Senegal: results of two surveys carried out in 1992 and 1996. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2001;30:700-5.

Kouakou P. Uterine ruptures: epidemiological aspects and materno-fetal prognosis at the maternity hospital of Bouake University Hospital rev. Cams series. 2007;5:87-91.

Bretones S, Cousin C, GualandI M, Meiller G - Uterine rupture: about a case of spontaneous rupture at 30 SA in a primary patient. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1997;26:324-7.

Dolo A, Keïta B, Diabate FS, Maïga B. Uterine ruptures during labor: about 21 cases at 'G Point National Hospital, Bamako. Medicine of Black Africa. 1991;38:2.

Abarikoto HF. Uterine ruptures during labor, observed at the CHUA / GOB Antananarivo Madagascar Revue d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et de Medicine d'Urgence. 2010;2(1):5-7.

Rajaonarison JJC. Uterine rupture during labor: etiologic factors and materno-fetal prognosis. Rev. anesth.-Réanim. med. Urgence. 2014;6(1):8-12.

Randriambelomanana JA, Botolahy ZA, Harimiandatsoa T, Heriniaina SA, Rakotoarijaona A, Andrianampanalinarivo HR. Uterine rupture: Study of 57 cases seen at the University Hospital Center of Toamasina Madagascar. RevAnesth-Réanim Méd Urg. 2010;2(3):4-6.

El Mansouri A. Rupture uterine: 50 cas. Rev Fr Gynecol. 1995;90:208-14.

Ministry of Health and Social Action of Senegal. Assessment of Neonatal Emergency Neonatal Needs (SONU) Needs in Senegal. 2012-2013:77.

AliIhonou E, et al Uterine ruptures. Favorable factors and prophylactic measures. Dakar Med 1983;28:553-9.