DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172324

Antenatal risk factors in emergency caesarean sections done for fetal distress

Uttara Aiyer Kohli, Sanjay Singh, Madhusudan Dey, Harpreet Kaur Bal, Atul Seth

Abstract


Background: Fetal distress is an important indication for emergency caesarean deliveries. The objective of this study is to identify the antenatal and intrapartum risk factors in emergency caesareans done for non-reassuring fetal status and compare with patients who underwent emergency caesareans for other indications.

Methods: It was a retrospective study and data was collected from the labour room records of a tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing emergency caesareans for fetal distress were the cases and the remaining emergency caesareans were the controls. Data was statistically analyzed.

Results: There were 5184 deliveries during this period of which, 669 were emergency caesareans. 126 (18.83%) of these were due to fetal distress/ non-reassuring fetal status and 543 (81.17%) were for other indications. Caesarean due to fetal distress accounted for 2.43% of the total deliveries. There were more primigravidae (61.11% Vs 46.04%) in the fetal distress group (Odds Ratio 1.84, p=0.003). Intra uterine growth restriction (OR 5.44, p<0.0001) and antepartum haemorrhage mainly due to abruption (OR 11.19, p <0.0001) were other important antenatal risk factors. Those with neonates of birth weight between 1.5 to 2.0 kgs were more likely to undergo emergency caesarean for fetal distress (OR 1.78, p=0.0435). The risk of a lower APGAR was higher in the fetal distress group (12.59%). 28.34% neonates in this group required NICU admission.

Conclusions: Primiparity, intrauterine growth restriction, antepartum hemorrhage and prematurity, have shown to significantly increase the risk of emergency cesareans due to non-reassuring fetal status. We need to improve antenatal care with a goal of early detection of the above risk factors for timely institution of appropriate intervention and thus contributing to a reduction of emergency caesareans due to fetal distress.


Keywords


Abruptio placentae, Emergency caesarean, Fetal distress, Intrauterine growth restriction, Non-reassuring fetal status

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACOG. Inappropriate use of the terms Fetal distress and Birth asphyxia ACOG committee opinion no. 326. Americon College of Obstreticians and Gyneologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1469-70.

Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Scott JR,Scardo JA, Hendrix NW, Martin JN jr. Cesarean delivery for fetal distress: rate and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol Survey. 2003;58(5):337-50.

Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring. Cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131:13-24.

Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, Deorari AK, Sharma JB, Karmakar D. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Ind J of Pediatrics. 2015;75(12):1249-52.

Gangwar R, Chaudhary S. Caesarean section for fetal distress and correlation with perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(S1):177-180.

David C, Lagrew MD, Melissa C, Bush MD, Anna M, McKeown MD et al. Emergent (crash) caesarean delivery: Indications and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(6):1638-43.

Akinola OI, Fabamwo AO, Tayo AO, Rabiu KA, Oshodi YA, Alokha ME. Caesarean section- an appraisal of some predictive factors in Lagos Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy and Child birth 2014,14:217

Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ and the ALSPAC Study Team, Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section.Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944women in England. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:353-67.