To study the painless labour by epidural analgesia and its effects on cardiotocographic parameters and labour

Authors

  • Neena Gupta Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sachidanand Gupta Department of Anaesthesiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Apurva Agarwal Department of Anaesthesiology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shaily Agarwal Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Seema Dwivedi Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anchal Singh Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur-208002, Uttar Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Epidural analgesia, Cardiotocographic parameters (CTG), Nonstress test, Labour

Abstract

Background: Epidural analgesia is a central nerve block technique achieved by injection of a local anesthetic close to the nerves that transmit pain and is widely used as a form of pain relief in labor. The objective was to study the effect of epidural analgesia on cardiotocographic parameters and relief of pain, effect on course of labor and its outcome in terms of duration, any complications and mode of delivery.

Methods: A prospective observational study was done on 100 subjects. They were randomly divided into study and control groups, study group (50) were given epidural analgesia after 3cm dilatation while control group (50) did not receive any analgesic. NST was taken before and after analgesia, course of labor, duration of labor, mode of delivery.

Results: The study shows no significant effect of epidural analgesia on the duration of labor, mode of delivery, and CTG parameters.

Conclusion: Epidural analgesia group shows better pain relief. It favors normal course of labor, no effect on cardiotocographic parameters. Subjects in study group were more satisfied.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Brownridge P. Treatment options for the relief of pain during childbirth. Drugs 1999; 41(1):69–80.

Howell CJ, Kidd C, Robert W, Upton P, Lucking L, Jones PW, Johanson RB: A randomized controlled trial of epidural compared with non epidural analgesia in labour. BJOG 2001 Jan;108(1):27-23.

Mousa WF, Al-Metwalli RR, Mostafa MM. Epidural analgesia during labor-0.5% lidocaine with fentanyl vs 0.08% ropivacaine with fentanyl. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2010;20:521–7.

Wesam Farid Mousa, Roshdi Al-Metwalli, and Manal Mostafa1 Epidural analgesia during labor vs no analgesia: A comparative study Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jan-Mar; 6(1): 36–40.

Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000331.

Chung KD, Liu WM, Wu YW, Hui YL. Painless labor and instrumentation. Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi. 1990 Sep;28(3):303-6.

Thorp JA, Breedlove G. Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits. Birth. 1996 Jun;23(2):63-83.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-13

How to Cite

Gupta, N., Gupta, S., Agarwal, A., Agarwal, S., Dwivedi, S., & Singh, A. (2016). To study the painless labour by epidural analgesia and its effects on cardiotocographic parameters and labour. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(4), 666–670. Retrieved from https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/265

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles