DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171566

Incision length: an emerging risk factors for surgical‐site infection following cesarean section

Tripti Nagaria, Avinashi Kujur, Neha Thakur

Abstract


Background: Since late nineteenth century, the caesarean section first done there is a tremendous improvement in the surgical and anaesthetic skills. It has emerged as a safe mode of delivery but now, in the present era there is a continuous rising trend of caserean section. Objective of present study is to evaluate the effect of some specific gestational factors and other known variables associated with poor wound healing in women who delivered by cesarean section.

Methods: A total of 1215 women delivered by cesarean section at Pt. JNM Medical college, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India from May 2014 to April 2015 were included in this study. The BMI was measured at gestational age when she got operated, grade of surgeons was noted. Subcutaneous tissue depth was intra-operatively measured from the fascia to the skin surface, while the incision length was measured after skin closure.

Results: Out of 1215 women operated 251 cases developed SSI with incidence of 20.5%. Incision length (OR 2.40, 95% CI 2.11-2.73; p<0.0001), Body mass index (BMI) at term (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.82-4.44; <0.0001), previous caesarean section scar (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96; p=0.02), Grade of surgeon (OR 5.5, 95% CI 3.3-9.3; p<0.0001), subcutaneous tissue thickness (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.60-2.23, p<0.0001) were found to be correlated with wound complications. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis suggested a cut-off of 28.7 for the BMI at term with AUC 0.8 (0.79-0.84, p<0.0001) and 147 mm for the wound length with an AUC 0.8 (95% CI 0.78-0.82; p <0.0001). The multivariate logistic regression model, applied to these variables showed an independent correlation of incision length with SSI   incision length >14.7; OR 2.40, 95% CI 2.11-2.73, p<0.0001.

Conclusions: Incision length by itself was found to be an independent risk factor for development of surgical site infection.


Keywords


BMI, Incision length, Surgeon skill, Surgical site infection

Full Text:

PDF

References


NICE guidelines [CG132]. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. London: RCOG; 2011.

National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS). System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32(8):470-85.

Srun S, Sinath Y, Seng AT, Chea M, Borin M, Nhem S et al. Surveillance of post-caesarean surgical site infections in a hospital with limited resources, Cambodia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7:579-85.

Ganguly PS, Khan Y, Malik A. Nosocomial infection and hospital procedures. Indian J Common Med. 2000;990-1014.

CDC/NHSN Surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. January 2015. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/17pscnosinfdef_current.pdf

WHO. Prevention of hospital acquired infections. A practical guide. 2nd edition; 2002 WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/200212. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Waldorf H, Fewkes J. Wound healing. Adv Dermatol. 1995;10:77-96.

Myles TD, Gooch J, Santolay J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:959-64.

Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient: a susceptible host for infection Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7(5):473-80.

Wall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, Pressman EK. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:952-6.

Perlow JH, Morgan MA. Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):560-5.

Conroy K, Koenig AF, Yu Y, Courtney A, Lee HJ, Norwitz ER et al. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery: 10 strategies to reduce risk. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012;5(2):69-77.

Vermillion ST, Lamoutte C, Soper DE, Verdeja A. Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:923-6.

Naumann RW, Hauth JC, Owen J, Hodgkins PM, Lincoln T. Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):412-6.

Cetin A, Cetin M. Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;57(1):17-21.

Wolf M, Kettyle E, Sandler L, Ecker JL, Roberts J, Thadhani R. Obesity and preeclampsia: the potential role of inflammation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(5 Pt 1):757-62.

CMACE/RCOG Joint Guidelines. Management of Women with Obesity in pregnancy.; March 2010

Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD004224.