Adnexal Torsion in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Challenging Diagnosis

Authors

  • Ahter Tanay Tayyar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Childrens Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
  • Ahmet Tayyar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Tolga Atakul Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey
  • Mehmet Baki Senturk Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Medeniyet University, Goztepe Educational and Research Hospital,Istanbul,Turkey
  • Cevat Rifat Cundubey Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
  • Mehmet Tayyar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172955

Keywords:

Adnexal torsion, Diagnosis, Pregnancy, Third trimester

Abstract

The incidence of adnexal torsion (AT) is reported 1 in 10000 births. AT is emergency condition in pregnancy, while the risk of late diagnosis is increased, in third trimester. Since it has been described as a severe complication after controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF), it is more common in IVF pregnancies. This condition mainly occurs in the first trimester; it is rare during the late third trimester. Herein, we report a case of a 26-year-old woman, gravida 1, singleton pregnancy in the 30th week of gestation was presented to emergency department with 24-hour history of a stabbing pain because of AT. Removal of adnexa performed by laparotomy. The patient had labour pain and cervical dilatation at the 36th week of gestation and a healthy girl weighing 2,200 g was born by emergency caesarean section due to breech presentation.

References

Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Otterblad Olausson P, Wennerholm UB. In vitro fertilisation in Sweden: obstetric characteristics, maternal morbidity and mortality. BJOG 2005; 112: 1529-1535.

Smorgick N, Pansky M, Feingold M, Herman A, Halperin R, Maymon R. The clinical characteristics and sonographic findings of maternal ovarian torsion in pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009;92 (6): 1983-1987.

Shalev J, Blankstein J, Mashiach R, Lampley CE, Bar-Hava I, Vardimon D, et al. Sonographic visualization of normal size ovaries during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneco 2000;15:523-526.

Chang SD, Yen CF, Lo LM, Lee CL, Liang CC. Surgical intervention for maternal ovarian torsion in pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011;50: 458-462.

Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Bar-On S, Almog B, Mashiach R, et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:536.e1-6.

Smorgick N, Maymon R, Mendelovic S, Herman A, Pansky M. Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarcheal women: can ultrasound indicate an ischemic process? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31: 338-341.

Kimura I, Togashi K, Kawakami S, Takakura K, Mori T, Konishi J. Ovarian torsion: CT and MR imaging appearances. Radiology 1994; 190: 337-341.

Kier R, Togashi K, Kawakami S, Takakura K, Mori T, Konishi J. Pelvic masses in pregnancy: MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176 (3): 709-713.

Weiner E, Mizrachi Y, Keidar R, Kerner R, Golan A, Sagiv R . Laparoscopic surgery performed in advanced pregnancy compared to early pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292:1063-1068.

Jackson H, Granger S, Price R, Rollins M, Earle D, Richardson W, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during preg- nancy: an evidence-based review . Surg Endosc 2008;22:1917-1927.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-24

Issue

Section

Case Reports