Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy in previous cesarean section: a retrospective study of 30 cases
Keywords:Bladder, Cesarean section, Hydrodissection method, Hysterectomy, Lateral window approach, Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy
Background: Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy (NDVH) is removal of uterus through vagina in non-prolapsed uterus. Objective of present study was to assess safety, feasibility of NDVH in patients with previous cesarean section.
Methods: Retrospective study was conducted in department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Shree Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara (SDM) College of Medical Sciences, Dharwad, India from April 2008 to June 2016. Effort was made to perform hysterectomies vaginally in women with benign conditions with history of one, two or three caesarean sections. Information regarding age, parity, number of previous LSCS, uterine size, blood loss, duration of operation, difficulties in separating bladder, intra -operative, post-operative complications were recorded.
Results: Total thirty cases were selected for NDVH with history of one, two and three cesarean sections. All successfully underwent NDVH, except one in which bladder injury occurred which was repaired at same time vaginally. Thirteen patients had previous one Lower Segment Cesarean Section (LSCS), sixteen had two LSCS and one had three LSCS. Commonest indication was abnormal uterine bleeding followed by leiomyoma of uterus. Mean duration of surgery was 97 min. Mean blood loss was 150 ml. Post-operative complications were minimal. Patient mobility, resumption of daily activities was fast. Mean hospital stay was 4-5 days.
Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy is safe, cost effective method of hysterectomy in women with previous cesarean section scar requiring hysterectomy for benign conditions with fewer complications, shorter hospital stay and less morbidity.
Singh KC, Barman SD, Sengupta R. Choice of hysterectomy for benign disease, department of obstetrics and gynaecology, university college of medical sciences, Delhi. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;54:365-70.
Unger JB. Vaginal hysterectomy for the women with moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200-700 grams. Am J obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1337-44.
Purohit RK, Sharma JG, Singh S, Giri DK. Vaginal hysterectomy by electrosurgery for benign indications associated with previous caesarean section. J Gynecol Surg. 2013;29(1):7-12.
Rooney CM, Crawford AT, Vassallo BJ. Is previous cesarean section a risk for incidental cystotomy at the time of hysterectomy? A case-controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:2041.
Lafay pillet MC, Leonard F, Chopin N. Incidence and risk factors of bladder injuries during laproscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: a 14.5 year experience in a continuous series of 1501 procedures. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:842.
Neis KJ, Zubke W, Fehr M, Römer T, Tamussino K, Nothacker M. Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(14):242-9.
Saha R, Shrestha NS, Thapa M, Shrestha J, Bajracharya J, Padhye SM. Non- descent vaginal hysterectomy; safety and feasibility. N J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;7(2):14-6.
Dewan R, Agarwal S, Minocha B, Sen SK. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy – an experience. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2004;54(4):376-8.
Bharatnur S. Comparative study of abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in non-descent cases. Internet J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;15(2):1528-39.
Bhadra B, Choudhary AP, Tolassaria A, Nupur N.Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH):personal experience in 158 cases. AL Ameen J Med Sci. 2011;4(1):23-7.
Singh A, Bansal S. Comparative study of morbidity and mortality associated with non-descent vaginal hysterectomy based on ultra-sonographic determination of uterine volume. Int surg. 2008;93(2):88-94.
Virmani S. Surgical trends in hysterectomy – a comparative analysis. Indian J Appl Res. 2014;12(4):261-3.
Unger JB, Meeks GR. Vaginal hysterectomy in women with history or previous casarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 pt 1):1473-8.
Sheth SS, Malpani AN. Vaginal hysterectomy following previous casarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;50(2):165-9.