DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173453

Mode of delivery and outcome of breech presentation: a prospective observational study in a tertiary centre

Rashmi Kumar Karning, Bhanu B. T., . Sarojini

Abstract


Background: Breech presentation is the commonest malpresentation with the incidence of 3-4% at term. This study was done with the objective of studying the mode of delivery in breech presentation and to compare the maternal and fetal outcome in patients delivered vaginally to those delivered by cesarean section.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in Vanivilas Hospital, affiliated to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, from June 2014 to May 2015. The study group included 509 patients with breech presentation who were studied with respect to their gestational age, birth weight, type of breech, mode of delivery, maternal and perinatal outcome.

Results: The incidence of breech presentation was 2.92% (509) among 17454 total deliveries with the incidence of 3.17% in primi and 2.73% in multies. 193 (38%) patients had vaginal breech delivery and 316 (62%) delivered by LSCS. Apgar score of less than 7 at 1 minute was seen with 21.42% of vaginally delivered fetuses and 9.09% of fetuses delivered by cesarean section. The perinatal mortality was 1.6% (8 cases) in vaginal group 0.8% (4 cases) in LSCS group. The short term maternal complications in LSCS group was 7.62% and in vaginal delivery group was 3.09%.

Conclusions: The short term maternal morbidity is higher in patients with cesarean section compared to those with vaginal breech delivery. Perinatal outcome is better in babies delivered by cesarean section. Still vaginal breech delivery can be an option for breech babies with proper selection and when conducted by a skilled obstetrician.


Keywords


Breech presentation, Mode of delivery, Vaginal breech delivery

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a largepopulation based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:851-2.

Hannah ME, Hannah MJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR et al. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;256:1375.

Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K et al. Outcome of children at 2years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term. The International Randomised Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):864-71.

Gilbert WM, Hicks SM, Boe NM, Danielsen B. Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5):911-7.

Moodley J, Khedhen SM, Devjee J. Breech presentation at a district level hospital in South Africa. SA Fan Pract. 2010;52(1):64-68.

Han HC, Tan KH, Chew SY. Management of breech presentation at term. Singapore Med J. 1993;34:247-252.

Alarab M, Regan C, O’Connell MD. Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: Still a safe option. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:407.

Pradhan P, Mohajer M, Deshpande S. Outcome of term breech births: 10‐year experience at a district general hospital. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;112(2):218-22.

Rietberg CC, Elferink‐Stinkens PM, Brand R, Loon AJ, Hemel OJ, Visser GH. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33,824 infants. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;110(6):604-9.

Rauf B, Ayub T. Maternal and Perinatal outcome in term singleton breech presentation. J Postgraduate Med Institute. 2001;18(3):373-9.