DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163550
Published: 2016-12-14

Total vaginal hysterectomy: outcome analysis of 108 cases at a tertiary centre

Monika Ramola, Divya Goswami, Vineeta Gupta, Nidhi Kumari, Priyanka Chaudhari

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate, analyze the indications of surgery, patients profile with respect to age group, parity, and comorbidities, intraoperative techniques, intra and post-operative complications and post-operative recovery.

Methods: A hospital based cross sectional descriptive study of 108 cases was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in a tertiary hospital over a period of one year. All patients admitted with benign gynecological conditions of the uterus were included in study. The patients with uterine prolapse, uterine size >16wks and more than one previous sections were excluded from the study.

Results: Among all the indications of TVH, abnormal uterine bleeding was the most common. Mean age group was 44.89 years and the mean parity was 2. Majority of the patients had no intra and post-operative complications. Postoperative recovery was good with shorter hospital stay.

Conclusions: TVH should be promoted as the route of choice for all benign gynaecological conditions. It is safe to do TVH in patients who are at poor general anaesthesia risk. In a state like Uttarakhand where medical facilities are hard to avail due to difficult geographic terrain, TVH has a special role .In lack of endoscopic facility, trained medical and paramedical staff and lack of postoperative monitoring instead of; there is a need to promote TVH. To top it all, TVH is the most cost effective route of hysterectomy. It is truly the natural orifice scarless surgery.


Keywords


Total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), Hysterectomy, Debulking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nieboer TE ,Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews. 2006;2:CD003677.

Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;85:18-23.

Wu JM, Wetcher ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;110(5):1091-95.

Martin X, Giata A, Golfier F, Raudrant D. Hysterectomy for a benign lesion: can the vaginal route be used in all cases? Journal Gynecol Obstet Biol Repord. 1999;28:124-30.

Maresh MJ, Metcalfe MA, Mc Pherson K, Overton C, Hall V, Hargreaves J, et al. The Value national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(3):302-12.

Agostini A, Bretelle F, Cravello L. Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse; a prospective comparative study. BJOG 2003;110(5):515-18.

Varma R, Tahseen S, Lo Kugamage AU, Kunde D. Vaginal route as the norm when planning hysterectomy for benign conditions; change in practice. Obstet Gynaecol 2001;97(4):613-6 .

Sheth SS, Malpani AN. Vaginal hysterectomy following previous cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;50(2):165-69.

Sizzi O, Paprella P, Bonito C. Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends. JSLS. 2004;8(4):339-46.

Davies A, O`Connor H, Magos AL. A prospective study to evaluate oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103(9):915-20.

Isik-Akbay EF, Harmanli OH, Panganamamula UR. Hysterectomy in obese women: A comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes. Obstet Gynaecol 2004;104 (4):710-14.

Bharatnur S. Comparative study of abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in non-descent cases. The Internet Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011;15(2):1528-8439.

Kumari S, Biswas A. Non descent vaginal hysterectomy: An experience of 508 cases. Global Journal for Research Analysis. 2016;5(3):142-44.

Patel A, Pawani C. Non descent Vaginal Hysterectomy; Safety and Feasibility. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2015;4(9):613-15.

Kumar N, Tayade S. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;4(3):785-89.

Chaminda SH. Outcome of Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy at a Single Centre in Sri Lanka: an observational study .Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016;37(3):42-6.

Mazdisnian F, Kurzel RB, Coe S. Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, nonmorbid procedure. Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;86:60-4.

Kumar S, Antony ZK. Vaginal hysterectomy for benign nonprolapse uterus-initial experiences. J Obstet Gynaecol Ind. 2004;54:60-3.

Magos A, Boyiras N, Sinha R. Vaginal hysterectomy for large uterus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:246-51.

Shanthini NF, Poomalar GK, Jayasree M, Bupathy A. Evaluation of complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;1(1):7-11.

Dorsey JH, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route; patient characteristics or physician reference? Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;173(5):1452-60.