DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173466

Role of hysterolaparoscopy for the evaluation of primary infertility: An experience from a tertiary care hospital

Benudhar Pande, Santosh Kumar Dora, Sharmila Pradhan, Bhawana Tiwary

Abstract


Background: Infertility is one of the most common problem for which couple seeks medical attention. The main objective of the study was to assess the role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of primary infertility patients.

Methods: For this retrospective study, patient with the diagnosis of primary infertility were recruited. Patients admitted between the periods 2014 to 2016 were included. Pertinent data related to infertility were collected from the case records and entered in predesigned performa.

Results: Patients with primary infertility 246 (82%) diagnosed to have pelvic pathology. The most common cause of infertility was ovarian 122 (36.63%), Uterine 66 (19.82%), tubal 84 (25.22%) and unexplained infertility in 103 (30.93%) women. Patients with PCOS 76 (22.82%) and endometriosis 46 (13.81%) treated with drilling and endometriotic cystectomy. In 32 (9.60%) of patients hysteroscopic cannulation was done. For distal tubal blockage fimbrioplasty was performed in 38 (11.41%) of women. Pelvic adhesions diagnosed in 26 (7.80%) women. patients diagnosed with uterine septum 42 (12.61%) required hysteroscopic septal resection. During the evaluation of infertility 70 (21%) of women diagnosed to have incidental pelvic pathology treated according to pathology.

Conclusions: Hysterolaparoscopy is emerging as a valuable technique for complete assessment of female infertility and also helps in treatment according to the cause.


Keywords


Hysteroscopy, Laparoscopy, Primary infertility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dyer SJ. International estimates on infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: potential need and demand for medical care. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2379-80.

Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:538-542.

Wilkes S, Chinn DJ, Murdoch A, Rubin G. Epidemiology and management of infertility: a population-based study in UK primary care. Fam Pract. 2009;26:269-74.

Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811-6.

Maroulis GB. Effect of aging on fertility and pregnancy, Seminars. Reprod Endocrinol. 1991;9:165.

Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. Federation CECOS. New Engl J Med. 1982;306:404.

Boricha YG, Sharma RK, Boricha BG, Mhapankar S, Chaterjee A, Narshetty J. Laparoscopy in 50 infertile couples: prospective study. Int J Med Clin Res.2011;2: 63-66.

Haider G, Rani S, Talpur S, Zehra N, Munir A. Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(1):136-38.

Shamim S, Farooq M, Shamim R. Diagnostic Laparoscopic Findings in Infertile Patients in the Saudi Population. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2010;4(4):560-3.

Jain G, Khatuja R, Juneja A, Mehta S. Laparoscopy:As a First Line Diagnostic Tool for Infertility Evaluation. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8(10): 01-02.

Hessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to poly-cystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:505-22.

Amer SA, Banu Z, Li TC, Cooke ID. Long-term follow-up of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome after laparoscopic ovarian drilling: endocrine and ultrasonographic outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2851-7.

Haney AF. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and pathophysiology. In: Wilson EA, ed. Endometriosis. New York: AR Liss,1987;23:51-6.

Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S, Lesaffre E, Cornillie FJ. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:759-65.

Bonneaua C, Chanellesa O, Siferb C, Ponceleta C. Use of laparoscopy in unexplained infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;163(1):57-61.

Goel G, Khatuja R, Radhakrishnan G, Agarwal R, Agarwal S, Kaur I. Role of newer methods of diagnosing genital tuberculosis in infertile women. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2013;56:155-7.

Kodaman PH, Arici A, Seli E. Evidence-based diagnosis and management of tubal factor infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16:221-9.

Schippert C, Bassler C, Soergel P, Hille U, Hollwitz B, Garcia-Rocha GJ. Reconstructive, organ-preserving microsurgery in tubal infertility: still an alternative to invitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1359-61.

Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:357-66.

Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:418-29.

Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GS. Clinical implications of uterine congenital uterine anomalies; a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:665-83.