Continence outcome following needle less operation (vaginal approach) using indigenous mesh

Neelam Goyal, Sanjay Kumar Goyal


Background: Economical and accessible non-extensive operation for stress incontinence in women who cannot afford expensive cost of mesh available for mini arc operation and other surgery of incontinences. Inexpensive hernial mesh (Hinglact), commonly available was used after indigenously designing it and placing it without a needle, under the Posterior urethral fascia with a single small vaginal incision.

Methods: The present study was conducted on 25 female patients of post-menopausal group who presented with pure stress incontinence complaints. These patients did not have any uterine descent or previous surgery. Indigenously designed hernia mesh used in place of expensive needled Incontinence Meshes available by a single small incision in posterior urethera area.

Results: Nearly 75% women with stress Incontinence were relieved of their symptoms with this inexpensive mesh without a needle.

Conclusions: Very effective, inexpensive mesh and surgical procedure for poor socio economic, group of women found to relieve significant Incontinent patients compared to commonly used mesh with a needle.


Incontinence, Mesh, Urinary

Full Text:



Chiarelli P, Brown W, McElduff P. Leaking urine: prevalence and associated factors in Australian women. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(6):567-77.

Moller LA, Lose G, Jorgensen T. The prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in women 40-60 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(4):298-305.

Simeonova Z, Milsom I, Kullendorff AM, Molander U, Bengtsson C. The prevalence of urinary incontinence and its influence on the quality of life in women from an urban Swedish population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(6):546-51.

Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):116-26.

Grimby A, Milsom I, Molander U, Wiklund I, Ekelund P. The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Ageing. 1993;22(2):82-9.

Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A. The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(4):378-82.

Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(5):291-306.

Vaart CH, Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. The effect of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder symptoms on quality of life in young women. BJU Int. 2002;90(6):544-9.

Vaart CH, Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(2):97-104.

Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P. Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG. 2007;114(5):522-31.

De RD, Berkers J, Deprest J, Verguts J, Ost D, Hamid D, et al. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on Mini Arc and Monarc slings. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(7):773-8.

Debodinance P, Delporte P. MiniArc. Preliminary prospective study on 72 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009;38(2):144-8.

Gauruder-Burmester A, Popken G. The Mini Arc sling system in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35(3):334-41.

Jimenez CJ, Hualde AA, Cebrian Lostal JL, Alvarez BS, Jimenez PJ, Montesino SM, et al. Stress urinary incontinence surgery with MiniArc swing system: our experience. Actas Urol Esp. 2010;34(4):372-7.

Kennelly MJ, Moore R, Nguyen JN, Lukban JC, Siegel S. Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;184(2):604-9.