Uterine artery Doppler study for the prediction and the severity of the hypertensive disorders during pregnancy

Authors

  • Saptarshi Chakraborty Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Sitapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Surabhi Saharan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Sitapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172904

Keywords:

Hypertensive disorders, Pregnancy, Uterine artery doppler

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorder in pregnancy is one of the major cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide particularly in developing countries. In developed countries, maternal mortality rate varies from 4-40 per 1 lakh live birth. In developing countries, it varies from 100-700 with India having 178 per 1 lakh live birth. Objectives were to study of uterine artery Doppler for the prediction of hypertensive disorders and its severity, Sensitivity and Specificity of Uterine Artery Doppler and their comparison for the prediction and the severity of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.

Methods: This is a prospective study. Approximately hundred patients with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy attending the OPD and IPD in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department will be included. All the patients in this study group will be subjected to Ultrasonographic evaluation of the pregnancy along with the Arterial Doppler of both the Uterine Artery and Umbilical Artery will be done.

Results: Using uterine artery Doppler Study in combination is significantly useful in early prediction of PIH having specificity and sensitivity of Uterine artery Doppler study – Pi Index as 91.67% and 85.71 %, Ri Index as 87.5% and 71.43% and diastolic notch as 94.44% and 92.85 % respectively. The use of uterine artery Doppler Study as an important tool for early prediction of PIH and has a lot of prognostic value.

Conclusions: The predictive accuracy of uterine artery Doppler study using Pi Index and Ri Index is better in the detection of early-onset PIH, than the late-onset disease. Thereby, it will help in the long run to prevent the increasing maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.

References

Vidya GS, Lalitha K, Hemanth T, Murthy NS. Prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a community based longitudinal study. JEMDS. 2015;4(50):8720-6.

Fisher SJ. The placental problem: linking abnormal cytotrophoblast differentiation to the maternal symptoms of preeclampsia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2(1):53.

Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376(9741):631-44.

Aloizos S, Seretis C, Liakos N, Aravosita P, Mystakelli C, Kanna E et al. HELLP syndrome: understanding and management of a pregnancy-specific disease. J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;33(4):331-7.

Mele C, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. InSeminars in Immunopathology. 2014;36(4):399-420.

Thaler I, Manor D, Itskovitz J, Rottem S, Levit N, Timor-Tritsch I et al. Changes in uterine blood flow during human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(1):121-5.

Conde-Agudelo AG, Romero RO, Lindheimer MD. Tests to predict preeclampsia. Chesley’s hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier. 2009:189-211.

Jeyabalan A. Epidemiology of preeclampsia: impact of obesity. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(suppl 1):S18- 25.

Trudinger BJ, Giles WB, Cook CM, Bombardieri J, Collins LE. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: clinical significance. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;92(1):23-30.

Fay RA, Ellwood DA, Bruce S, Turner A. Color Doppler imaging of the uteroplacental circulation in the middle trimester: observations on the development of a low‐resistance circulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(5):391-5.

Harrington KD, Cooper D, Lees C, Hecher K, Campbell S. Doppler ultralsound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small‐for‐gestational‐age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7(3):182-8.

Bhatt CJ, Arora J, Shah MS. Role of color Doppler in pregnancy induced hypertension (A study of 100 cases). Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2003;13(4):417.

Cnossen JS, Morris RK, Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Coomarasamy A et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. Canadian Med Assoc J. 2008;178(6):701-11.

Oloyede OA, Iketubosin F. Uterine artery Doppler study in second trimester of pregnancy. Pan Afr Med J. 2013;15(1):87.

AbouZahr C. Cautious champions: international agency efforts to get safe motherhood onto the agenda. Safe motherhood strategies: A review of the evidence. 2001. Available at http://www.jsieurope.org/safem/collect/safem/pdf/s2946e/s2946e.pdf.

Sajith M, Nimbargi V, Modi A, Sumariya R, Pawar A. Incidence of pregnancy induced hypertension and prescription pattern of antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy. Age (years). 2014;23:4-0.

Kooffreh ME, Ekott M, Ekpoudom DO. The prevalence of pre-eclampsia among pregnant women in the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar Prevalence. 2014;3(3):133-6.

Singh S, Ahmed EB, Egondu SC, Ikechukwu NE. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy among pregnant women in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Med J. 2014;55(5):384.

Saxena S, Srivastava PC, Thimmaraju KV, Mallick AK, Dalmia K, Das B. Socio-demographic profile of pregnancy induced hypertension in a tertiary care centre. Sch J App Med Sci. 2014;2(6D):3081-6.

Aabidha PM, Cherian AG, Paul E, Helan J. Maternal and fetal outcome in pre-eclampsia in a secondary care hospital in South India. J Fam Med Prim Care.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles