DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20174038

Risks and benefits of two different entry techniques for laparoscopic gynecological surgeries

Poonam Agarwal, Ritu Yadav, Apurv Agarwal

Abstract


Background: Primary abdominal access still remains a challenge for laparoscopic surgery despite rapid advances. This study was conducted to prospectively analyse and compare risks and benefits of two different entry techniques namely, veress needle and direct trocar in laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries so as to obtain consensus on the optimal method to be followed to create pneumoperitoneum.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized study conducted at Deen Dayal Upadhyay hospital, under Delhi government. During the period January 2014 to June 2016, 800 patients (20-65 years) operated laparoscopically by the same team of surgeons for various gynaecological conditions, were randomized in two groups: Veress needle group (VN) and Direct trocar group (DT). Each group comprised of 400 patients. Comparison of various parameters was done between the two groups.

Results: Incidence of major complications in terms of visceral injuries was 0.75% (3/400) in DT group and nil in VN group. Open conversion rate (2/400 i. e. 0.5%) and number of attempts required to create pneumoperitoneum were also more in DT group. Failed access in previous surgery cases was 1.2% (1/38) in VN and 14.8% (4/27) in DT group. Incidence of port site bleeding (n=3) was also more in DT group. Although the incidence of minor complications such as extraperitoneal insufflations (n=5) and no. of failed access (n=6) were more in VN group, there was no incidence of any life-threatening complication.

Conclusions: In our experience, there is clear evidence of advantage of using veress needle in preventing major complications. Veress needle is therefore safer, convenient and effective technique of creating pneumoperitoneum.


Keywords


Direct Trocar, Laparoscopy, Pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle

Full Text:

PDF

References


Krishnakumar S, Tambe P. Entry Complications in Laparoscopic Surgery. J Gynecol Endoscop Surger. 2009;1(1):4-11.

Laparoscopic Entry: A Review of Techniques Sogc.Available form; org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gui/93ECPG0705w.

Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Americ College Surg. 2001;192(4)478-91.

Catarci M, Carlini M, Santioro E. Major and minor injuries during creation of pneumopertoneum, A multicentre study of 12919 cases. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:566-9.

Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Eubanks WS (eds): Mastery of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery, 2nd ed. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2005.

Molly D, Kallo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV.Laparoscopic entry:a literature review and analysis of techniques and complication of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(3):246-54.

Ahmed G, Gent D, Henderson D, O Flynn H, Philips k, Watson A Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD006583.

Jiang X, Anderson C, Schvatz PF. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Reading hospital and Medical centre, Pennsylvania, USA. 2011;19612-6052.

Imran M, Chohan MZ, Mehmood Z, Mehmood K, Asif K. Comparison of veress needle and direct trocar insertion in establishing pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PJMHS. 2014;8(3):652-4.

Angioli R, Terranova C, Nardone CD, CafĂ  EV, Damiani P, Portuesi R, et al. A comparison of three different entry techniques in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective trial. Eur J Obstetrs Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2013;31;171(2):339-42.

Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, Nezhat C. Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:148-50.

Thepsuwan J, Huang KG, Wilamarta M, Adlan AS, Manvelyan V, Lee CL. Principles of safe abdominal entry in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Minimally Invasive Therapy. 2013;30;2(4):105-9.

Vilos GA, Vilos AG. Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle C02 insufflation pressure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:415-20.

Vilos AG, Vilos GA, Abu-Rafea B, Hollet-Caines J, Al-Omran M. Effect of body habitus and parity on the initial Veres intraperitoneal (VIP) C02 insufflation pressure during laparoscopic access in women. J Minim Invasive gynecol. 2006:13(2):108-13.