DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20174406

Indications and rate of caesarean delivery at tertiary care hospital: a retrospective study

Reena Sharma, Poojan Dogra

Abstract


Background: Worldwide there has been an increase in the rate of caesarean delivery due to multiple factors. Objective of the study was to assess the prevalence and different indications of caesarean section in this institute.

Methods: The aim of the study is to analyse the rates and indications of lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) in our institution. We conducted a retrospective study over a period of six months; 1st September 2016 to 1st March 2017 at SLBSGMC Mandi at Nerchowk. Total number of patients who delivered in our hospital during the defined study period was recorded and a statistical analysis of various parameters was done.

Results: The total number of women delivered over the study period was 2075, out of which caesarean sections (CS) were 473. The overall CS rate calculated was 22.8%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate.

Conclusions: Routine obstetric audits should be done to analyse the various indications of emergency and elective caesarean sections so that protocols and guidelines can be implemented to curtail the increasing trend of caesarean delivery.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Indications of CS, Previous LSCS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Caesarean section. Wikipedia. Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarean_section Downloaded 12.02.2013.

Turner MJ. Delivery after one previous caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:741-4.

Oladapo OT, Sotunsu JO, Sule-Odu AO. The rise in caesarean birth rate in Sagamu, Nigeria: reflection of changes in obstetrics practice. J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:377-81.

Betran AP, Mepaldim, Lauer JA, Bingshun W, Thomas J, Vanlook P et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:98-113.

Pádua KS, Osis MJ, Faúndes A, Barbosa AH, Moraes Filho OB. Factors associated with caesarean section in Brazilian Hospitals. Rev Saude Publica 2010;44(1):70-9.

WHO Statement on caesarean section rates; 2015, WHO reference number: WHO/RHR/15.02. Available at http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/. Accessed on 15 July 2016.

Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple caesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):262.

Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;375:490-9.

WHO Statement on caesarean section rates; 2015, WHO reference number: WHO/RHR/15.02. available at http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/. Accessed on 15 July 2016.

Singh A, Channawar R. A recent way of evaluating caesarean birth. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2009;59(6):547-51.

Festin MR, Laopaiboon M, Pattanittum P, Ewens MR, Henderson-Smart DJ, Crowther CA; SEA-ORCHID Study Group. Caesarean section in four South East Asian countries: reasons for, rates, associated care practices and health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 9;9:17.

WHO Euro Health for all database, 2014. Available at http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb/(53). Accessed on 15 July 2016.

Mukherjee SN. Rising caesarean rate. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(4):298-300.

Enkin M. Labour and delivery following previous caesarean section. In Enkin M, Keirs MJ,Chalmers I(eds). Elective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, Oxford: Oxford University Press;1989:1196-1215.

Jawa A, Garg S, Tater A, Sharma U. Indications and rates of lower segment caesarean section at tertiary care hospital - an analytical study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(10):3466-9.

Subedi S. Rising rate of caesarean section - a year review. J Nobel Med Coll. 2012;1(2):72-76.

Bergsjø P, Maltau JM. Anatomv. Bleeding in the last part of pregnancy. In Maltau BP, Molne JM, Nesheim K. Obstetrics and Gynecology. First circulation. 2nd ed. Gyldendal Norwegian publishing house. 2010.

Malabary OT, Balayla J. The effect of pelvic size on cesarean delivery. J Pediatr Adolecent Gynecol. 2012;25(3):190-4.

Kiserud T. Chapter 10 Fetal growth and growth. In Bergsjø, P. Maltau, J.M. Molne, K. Nesheim, B.I.

Obstetrics and Gynecology. Gyldendal Norwegian publishing house. Second ed. first circulation 2010.

Unnikrishnan B, Rakshith Prasad B, Aishwarya Amarnath NK, Rekha T, Prasanna PM et al. Trends and indications for caesarean section in a tertiary care obstetric hospital in Coastal South India. Emergency. 2010;1137:64-7.

Hannah M, Hannah W. Caesarean section or vaginal birth for breech presentation at term. BMJ. 1996;312:1433-4.