Comparison of incidences and indications of multi primary caesarean with primi caesarean mothers in a tertiary care teaching hospital

M. Sujatha Alagesan, M. Meena


Background: The incidences and indications of caesarean sections between the primary caesarean multies and caesarean primies were comparable in respect of their demographical and clinical variables of mothers and their foetal outcomes. Aim and objective of the study was to analyze the incidences and indications of primary caesarean multies and caesarean primies. To compare the incidences and indications of mothers between the primary caesarean multies and caesarean primies. To compare the demographic and clinical profiles of the mothers and babies.

Methods: During January to June 2016 total of 3583 deliveries were conducted in Tiruneleli Medical College Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India. Among them 89 and 1168 were primary caesarean multies and caesarean primies respectively. They had been compared according to the objectives.

Results: The caesarean incidences were 62.5% among the primies and 4.8% among the multies as Primary. The primary caesarean incidences among the multies were statistically significantly lesser in the 15-24 ages than the primi (P<0.05). 25-29 age bracket the incidences were not differed significantly (P>0.05). After 30 years of age, the incidences were statistically significantly increased among the multies (P<0.05). The birth weight of babies did not show any statistically significant indications between the two groups (P>0.05). The indications of Foetal distress, Severe Oligo hydration and others did not show any statistically significantly difference between the groups (P>0.05). Mal presentation and Ante Partum hemorrhage were significantly more among the multies than primies (p<0.05) and Failed indication and CPD were the significantly lesser indication than the primies (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Without reducing the caesarean section rate in primi we cannot bring down the overall caesarean rate of delivery.


Caesarean, Comparison, Primary multies, Primies

Full Text:



Brown HL. Informing the patient and the community about the implications of primary cesarean. In Seminars in perinatology. 2012;36(5):403-6. WB Saunders.

Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstetr Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226-32.

Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010;(29):1-20,24.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;60(1):1-70.

Barber EL, Lundsberg L, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Contributing indications to the rising cesarean delivery rate. Obstetr Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29.

Desai E, Leuva H, Leuva B, Kanani M. A study of primary caesarean section in multipara. Internat J Reproduct Contracept Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;2(3):320-4.

Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, Wang X, Ruan Y, Zou L, et al. A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):410.

Das S, Char D, Sarkar S, Saha TK. Changing trends in caesarean section: rate and indications. J Dental Med Sci. 2014;13(1):7-9.

Sharmila G. Study of primary caesarean section in multi gravida, Asian pacific journal of health sciences. 2016;3(4):89-94.

Himabindhu P. Primary caesarean section in multi IOSR. 2016;14(5):22-5.

Ahmed SR, Alsheeha MA, Alsammani MA. Risks and indications for cesarean sections in primiparous women: A case-control study. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2013;6(5):541.

Annelee B, Uma MR, Helain JL, Chun-CH, Rita WD, Laughon SK. Primary Cesarean Delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):33-40.

Samal R, Palai P, Ghose S. Clinical study of primary caesarean section in multiparous women in a tertiary care hospital. Internat J Reproduct Contracept Obstetr Gynecol. 2017;5(5):1506-9.