DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173626

Factors influencing the likelihood of vacuum delivery success

Kunaal K. Shinde, Anand Karale, Gulabsingh Shekhawat

Abstract


Background: Instrumental or assisted vaginal birth is commonly used to expedite birth, for the benefit of either mother, baby or both. Objective of present study was to evaluate risk factors for unsuccessful vacuum delivery when variability between individual accoucheurs is taken into account.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of attempted 687 vacuum deliveries over a 10-year period (2008–2017 inclusive) in a tertiary care center at Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Narhe to account for inter-accoucheur variability, we matched unsuccessful deliveries (cases) with successful deliveries (controls) by the same operators. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare successful and unsuccessful vacuum deliveries.

Results: During the study period of 10 years, there were 29861 deliveries, of which 19831 (66.4%) were vaginal deliveries. 8802 (29.47%) were cesarean deliveries and 1228 (4.1%) were instrumental deliveries. Among instrumental deliveries, 687 (56%) were vacuum deliveries and 541 (44%) were forceps deliveries. Six hundred and eighty-seven ventouse deliveries of vertex presenting, single, term infants were attempted, of which 38 were unsuccessful (5.5%). Increased birth weight (OR=1.11 p<0.001), second-stage duration (OR=1.01 p<0.001), rotational delivery (OR=1.52 p<0.05) and use of ventouse versus forceps (OR=1.33 p<0.05) were associated with unsuccessful outcome. When inter-accoucheur variability was controlled for, instrument selection and decision to rotate were no longer associated with vacuum delivery success. More senior accoucheurs had higher rates of unsuccessful deliveries (12% v. 5%, p<0.05), but undertook more complicated cases. Cesarean delivery in the second stage without prior attempt at ventouse delivery was associated with higher birth weight (OR=1.07 p<0.001), increased maternal age (OR=1.03 p<0.01), and epidural analgesia (OR=1.46 p<0.001).

Conclusions: Careful selection of cases and adequate training of post graduate students during residency under direct supervision of senior experienced obstetrician can reduce the rate of failed vacuum delivery and related complications Results suggest that birth weight and head position are the most important factors in successful vacuum delivery, whereas the influence of patient selection and rotational delivery appear to be operator-dependent. Risk factors for lack of vacuum delivery success are distinct from risk factors for requiring vacuum delivery, and these should not be conflated in clinical practice.


Keywords


Birth trauma, Instrumental delivery, Perineal tear, Still births, Vacuum delivery, Ventouse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V. Choice of instruments in assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD005455.

Department of health. Statistical Bulletin. Maternity Statistics England 2003-2004. London. HMSO;2004.

Bofill JA, Parr KG, Roberts WF, Martin RW, Morrison JC, Rust OA. Forceps and vacuum delivery: A survey of North American residency programs. Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;88(4Pt1):622-5.

O Connell SW, Lindow M. Trends in obstetric care in Unite Kingdom. J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;20:592-3.

Patel RR, Murphy DJ. Forceps delivery in modern obstetrics practice. BMJ. 2004;328:1302-5.

Lewis G, Drife J. Why do mothers die? 1997-99: The fifth report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2001. Available at http://www.cemd.org.uk/reports/cemdrpt.pdf

Vacca A. Vacuum-assisted delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16(1):17- 30.

Information and Statistics Division. Operative vaginal deliveries. Available at http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/info3.jsp?pContentID=2152andp_applic=CCCandp_serv

Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal cranial injury. New Engl J Medic. 1999;341(23):1709-14.

Milkovasky P, Watson WJ, Obstetric vaccum extraction: State of art in the new millennium. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2001;56(11):736-51.

Senecal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):763-72.

Al-Suhel R, Gill S, Robson S, Shadbolt B. Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(5):510-4.

Tempest N, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Hapangama D. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG. 2013;120(10):1277-84.

O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, menon V. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD005455.

Ben-Haroush A, Melamed N, Kaplan B, Yogev Y. Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):308 e1-8 e5.

Abenhaim HA, Morin L, Benjamin A, Kinch RA. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134(2):164-8.

Dhanjal, MK, Kenyon, A. Scientific Impact Paper No. 34: Induction of labour at term in older mothers. UK. RCOG. 2013.

Al-Kadri H, Sabr Y, Al-Saif S, Abulaimoun B, Ba'Aqeel H, Saleh A. Failed individual andsequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(7):642-8.

Gopalani S, Bennett K, Critchlow C. Factors predictive of failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):896-902.

Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Silberstein T, Hallak M, Katz M, Mazor M. Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med. 2001;46(9):819-24.