DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20174417

A pilot study evaluating the feasibility of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications in women in rural India

Anjali Soni, Pawan Kumar Soni, Chanderdeep Sharma, Suresh Verma, Shivani Vashasit

Abstract


Background: Hysterectomy for benign indications is one of the common surgical procedures performed on women worldwide. Despite the available evidence favouring vaginal surgery still abdominal route is preferred in majority of women in rural India. Hence, this pilot study was done to determine the feasibility of Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) in rural India.

Methods: All women planned for hysterectomy for benign indications (with no or minimal pelvic organ prolapse) during a period of six months were enrolled after taking informed consent and subsequently, underwent NDVH. Data was analyzed retrospectively with respect to duration of surgery, average blood loss, complications of surgery and duration of stay in the hospital.

Results: All except one woman out of 37 women enrolled for the study had an un-eventful surgery with median duration of surgery [median 30 minutes; (range 30-55 minutes)], median hospital stay [(median 2 days) range 2-7 days], and minimal blood loss [median 50 ml (range 50-200 ml)]. There was one case of inadvertent cystotomy (diagnosed and repaired intra-operatively), and discharged in healthy condition on seventh post-operative day.

Conclusions: NDVH is a safe option for hysterectomy (in women without pelvic organ prolapse) for benign indications even in rural India. It has been found to be associated with short hospital stay, minimal blood loss and short recovery time.


Keywords


Benign indications, Hysterectomy, Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, Rural India

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sharma C, Sharma M, Raina R, Soni A, Chander B, Verma S. Gynecological diseases in rural India: A critical appraisal of indications and route of surgery along with histopathology correlation of 922 women undergoing major gynecological surgery. J Midlife Health. 2014 Apr;5(2):55-61.

Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD003677.

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: A randomized, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG. 2000;107:1380-5.

Dorsey JH, Holtz PM, Griffiths RI, McGrath MM, Steinberg EP. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:476-82.

Kovac SR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:787-93.

Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:34.e1-7.

Bower JK, Schreiner PJ, Sternfeld B, Lewis CE. Black-White differences in hysterectomy prevalence: The CARDIA study. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:300-7.

Rizvi G, Pandey H, Pant H, Chufal SS, Pant P. Histopathological correlation of adenomyosis and leiomyoma in hysterectomy specimens as the cause of abnormal uterine bleeding in women in different age groups in the Kumaon region: A retroprospective study. J Midlife Health. 2013;4:27-30.

Mukhopadhaya N, Manyonda IT. The hysterectomy story in the United Kingdom. J Midlife Health 2013;4:40-1. Government of India. Annual Report to the People on Health.New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2010.

Kovac SR. Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(1):58-71.

Sheth SS, Paghdiwalla KP, Hajari AR. Vaginal route: a gynaecological route for much more than hysterectomy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(2):115-32.

Allam IS, Makled AK, Gomaa IA, El Bishry GM, Bayoumy HA, Ali DF. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(6):1341-5.

Gizzo S, Noventa M. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for vaginal hysterectomies: criticism of evidences from a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(6):1045-6.

Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Rodolakis A, Haidopoulos D, Christakis D, Vlachos G. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for vaginal hysterectomies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(2):215-22.

Darai E, Soriano D, Kimata P, Laplace C, Lecuru F. Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: Randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:712-6.

Levy B, Emery L. Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(1):147-51.

Cronjé HS, de Coning EC. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;91(3):243-5.