DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173683

Surgical management of vaginal agenesis using a modified Mc Indoe’s technique: VIMS experience

Chandrashekhar Tharihalli, Muralikrishna V., Shiva Kumar H. C.

Abstract


Background: Mullerian agenesis is a challenge to reconstructive surgeons. In order to create a new vagina that mimic the normal one in size, lining and appearance, multiple techniques have been designed; among these techniques Mc Indoe’s vaginoplasty represents the simplest one with good results. Mc Indoe’s operation which involves the creation of a space between bladder and rectum, insertion of a mould covered with split-thickness skin graft into that neo-vaginal space, and use of postoperative vaginal mould for dilation and to avoid stenosis. However, many modifications have been introduced in time in an attempt to increase the success rates. The purpose of vaginal agencies treatment is to create an adequate passage for penetration during sexual intercourse.

Methods: Between Jan 2010 to June 2017, ten patients with vaginal agenesis were admitted to Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VIMS Ballari for vaginal reconstruction. All cases underwent a modified Mc Indoe’s technique, and follow up was done for one year.

Results: All ten cases of vaginal agenesis underwent vaginal reconstruction by modified Mc Indoe's technique. Post-operative vaginal length varied from 5 to 7 cm in patients who used mould regularly. Successful skin graft take was achieved in 6 cases. one case of perforation of rectum and one case of vaginal stricture was noted.

Conclusions: To optimize sexual comfort, the clinical management of women with vaginal agenesis must be multidisciplinary and individually tailored. Our findings suggest that the modified Mc Indoe’s technique is a simple, effective procedure for the treatment of vaginal agenesis, but proper mould usage after surgery remains the cornerstone of the treatment.


Keywords


Mc Indoe’s vaginoplasty, MRKH syndrome, Mould, Vaginal agenesis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sadove RC and Horton CE. Utilizing full-thickness skin grafts for vaginal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1988;15:443-8.

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Current evaluation of amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):148-55.

ACOG committee opinion. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):167-70.

Dixon D, Wali F, Hail S, Welch R, Davis G. Treatment of Vaginal Aplasia among Afghan Women with the McIndoe’s Vaginoplasty. Female Pelvic Med Reconst Surg. 2010;16(3):179-87.

Bastu E, Akhan SE, Mutlu MF, Nehir A, Yumru H, Hocaoglu E et al. Treatment of vaginal agenesis using a modified Mc Indoe’s Technique-long tern follow up of 23 patients and literature review. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(4):241-4.

Karim RB, Hage JJ, Dekker JJM, Schoot CMH. Evolution of the methods of neo-vaginoplasty for vaginal aplasia. Eur J Obstet, Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;58:19-27.

Makinoda S, Nishiya M, Sogame M, Mikuni M, Kojo T, Fujino T et al. Non-grafting method of vaginal construction for patients of vaginal agenesis without functioning uterus (Mayer-Rokitansky- Kuster syndrome). Int Surg. 1996;81:385-9.

Fedele L, Bianchi S, Tozzi L. A new laparoscopic procedure for creation of a neovagina in Mayer- Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(5):854-8.

Wesley JR, Coran AG. Intestinal vaginoplasty for congenital absence of the vagina. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(7):885-9.

McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE. Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconst Surg.1976;58:176-83.

Khazanchi RK, Takkar D. Vaginal depth following reconstruction with pudendal thigh flaps in congenital vaginal atresia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(2):592-3.

Okada E, Iwahira Y, Maruyama Y. Treatment of vaginal agenesis with an expanded vulval flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(3):530-3.

Vesanovi´c S, Panajotovi´c L, Garaleji´c E. Sensibility of vagina reconstructed by McIndoe’s method in Mayer- Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2008;65(6):449-55.

Tercan M, Balat O, Bekerecioglu M, Atik B. The use of fibrin glue in the McIndoe’s technique of vagino- plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:706-9.

Hojsguard A, Villadsen I. Mc Indoe’s procedure for congenital vaginal agenesis, Complications and results. Br J Plast Surg. 1995;48:97-102.

Abbe R. New method of creating a vagina in case of congenital absence. Med Rec (NY). 1898;54:836-8.

Frost-Arner L, Aberg M, Jacobsson S. Split skin graft reconstruction in vaginal agenesis: A long-term follow-up. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38:151.

Barnhart KT, Izquierdo A, Pretorius ES, Shera DM, Shabbout M, Shaunik A. Baseline dimensions of the human vagina. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(6):1618-22.

Borkowski A, Czaplicki M, Dobronski P. Twenty years of experience with Krzeski’s cystovaginoplasty for vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: Anatomical, histological, cytological and functional results. BJU Int. 2008;101:1433-40.

Rock JA, Reeves LA, Retto H, Baramki TA, Zacur HA, Jones HW. Success following vaginal creation for Mullerian agenesis. Fertil Steril.1983;39:809-13.

Edmonds DK. Congenital malformations of the genital tract and their management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;17:19.