DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163851

Hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine cavity in cases of infertility and its correlation with transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosalpingography

Padma Shukla, Kalpana Yadav, Sakshi Mishra

Abstract


Background: Infertility is defined as one year of unprotected intercourse without pregnancy. This study was taken up to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy in comparison with hysterosalpingography and vaginal ultrasound in the evaluation of the uterine cavity as first line study in the infertile patient.

Methods: A Prospective and comparative study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.S. Medical College and associated Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Rewa, MP, India in a period of 13 months from August 2014 to September 2015 conducted on 60 subjects.

Results: 60 patients were evaluated with diagnosis of primary and secondary infertility. Hysteroscopy showed alterations in 65%, predominantly uterine synechiae, chronic endometritis and endometrial polyp. Hysterosalpingography reported a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 66.6%. The agreement between the two methods was moderate. The transvaginal ultrasound reported a sensitivity of 51.21% and a specificity of 100%, the agreement between these two procedures was moderate. There were no complications during hysteroscopy.

Conclusions: We believe that transvaginal ultrasound, hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy are complementary in the evaluation of the infertile patient but Hysteroscopy can diagnose small intrauterine lesions much more precisely, (compared with HSG and even TVS) and treat them simultaneously. Thus we consider routine hysteroscopy should be included in the evaluation of the infertile couple.

 


Keywords


Hysteroscopy, Hysterosalpingography, Infertility, Transvaginal ultrasound

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO. Manual for investigation and diagnosis of infertile couple, Cambridge, UK. 2000.

Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank Harmann P. definition and prevalence of infertility and subfertility. Hum reprod. 2005.

Dutta S, Guha R. A clinico-anatomical study on the etiological factors pertaining to primary infertility in females using some common investigative procedures. J Anat Soc India. 2007;56:14-7.

International Institute of population Sciences. National Family Health Survey; 1998-99, India. International Institute of population Sciences, Mumbai, India. 2000.

Talwar PP, Goel OP, Murali IN. Prevalence of infertility in different population groups in India and its determinants. ICMR, 1986.

Brown SE, Codinton CC, Schnorr JJ. evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosnography and HSG in infertile women: a prospective randomized study. FertilSteril, 2000.

Dalfo R A, Ubeda B, Ubeda A. diagnostic value of HSG in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities, a comparision with hysteroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004.

Soares SR, Barbosa dos reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, TVS and HSG in patient with uterine cavity disease. Fertil Steril. 2000.

El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N, El-Sherbiny W, Saber W. Outpatient hysteroscopy: A routine investigation before assisted reproductive techniques? Fertil Steril®. 2011;95(1):272-6.

Shea R, Shah I. infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in Developing Countries. DHS Comparative Reports No. 9. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization. 2004.

Rowe P, Hargreave T, Mellows H. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple, The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 1993.

deSá Rosa e de Silva AC, Rosa e Silva JC, Cândido dos Reis FJ, Nogueira AA, Ferriani RA. Routine office hysteroscopy in the investigation of infertile couples before assisted reproduction. J Reprod Med. 2005;50:501-6.

Koskas M, Mergui JL, Yazbeck C, Uzan S, Nizard J. Office hysteroscopy for infertility: a series of 557 consecutive cases. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010;2010:168096.

Lawrenz B, Neunhoeffer E, Lessman-Bechle S, Wallwiener D, Fehm T, Becker S. Reveals How Often pathology office hysteroscopy not on transvaginal ultrasound with previously NOTED - to look at two typical reproductive endocrinology patients groups, treats including failed IVF-ET patients. Surg Gynecol. 2010;7:417-21.

Ragni G, Diaferia D, Vegetti W, Colombo M, Arnoldi M, Crosignani PG. Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up: A comparison With transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59:184- 8.

Camuzcuoglu H, Yildirim Y, Sadik S, Kurt S, Tinar S. Comparison of the accuracy of the hysteroscopic and hysterosalpingography in evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss With. Surg Gynecol. 2005;2:159-63.

Dalfó A, Úbeda Úbeda AB, Monzon M, Rotger R, Ramos R. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: A comparison With hysteroscopy. AJR. 2004;183:1405-9.

Koskas M, Mergui J, Yazbeck C, Uzan S, Nizard J. Office hysteroscopy for infertility: A Series of 557 Cases consecutives. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;16:80- 96.