External cephalic version at 36 weeks and its outcome
Keywords:Breech, Caesarean section, External cephalic version, Tocolysis
Background: External cephalic version (ECV) is well known non-invasive procedure done for the management of breech presentation but is not routinely practised by obstetricians in many clinical settings. The aim of the study was to assess the success rate of external cephalic version, labour outcome of pregnancy after successful ECV, to study maternal and foetal complications associated with ECV and to explore the reasons for failed ECV.
Methods: It was a prospective interventional study to assess the labour outcomes of pregnancies with successful and uncomplicated ECV. All women who had singleton breech presentation at 36+ weeks were included unless contraindications for ECV were present. After obtaining consent, ECV was attempted after giving tocolysis.
Results: The total number of deliveries was 6038 in the same period. Out of these 301 were breech presentations thus the incidence of breech presentation was 4.9%. ECV was offered to 81 women (26.9%) and out of these 77 women (95.06%) gave consent for the procedure. The remaining 4 (4.93%) did not give consent due to anxiety about the procedure. The success rate was 54.54%. Out of total 301 women with breech presentation 40 women (13.3%) had assisted breech delivery and 216 women (71.8%) had caesarean section due to obstetric indications. Thus the caesarean section rate for breech presentation at our institute was 71.8%. ECV was successful in 63.82% of the multigravida on which it was attempted as compared to 40% of the primigravida. The success rate of ECV in the present study is maximum when ECV was performed at a gestational age of 38-39 weeks and when fetal weight was less than 3000 grams. Out of the 42 successful ECV cases, 4 babies (9.52%) had neonatal sepsis and 1 was still born (2.3%) which was unrelated to ECV.
Conclusions: ECV is a valuable though under used option in the management of breech presentation at term. It is a relatively safe procedure, simple to learn and perform. Vigilance for breech presentation after 36 weeks is important. ECV at term using tocolytics should be part of the routine management of breech presentation.
Carlos O, Steven L. A Randomised placebo-controlled evaluation of terbutaline for external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:775-9.
Gifford DS, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Reductions in cost and caesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: A decisionanalysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:930-6.
Baker PN, Kenny LC: Antenatal obstetric complications. In: Obstetrics by Ten teachers. 19th edition. Hodder and Stoughton Ltd; 2011: 95-101.
External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guideline No. 20a. December 2006.
Richard H. Breech presentation. In Obstetrics and Gynaecology. An evidence-based text for MRCOG. In: David ML, Philip NB, editors. 1st edition. Oxford: Charon Tec Pvt. Ltd; 2004:413-426.
Abercrombie GF. The timing of external version. Proceedings Royal Society Med. 1957;51:163.
Wibool R. Efficacy of External Cephalic Version with Tocolysis in Late Pregnancy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(1):19-24.
Healey M, Porter R, Galimberti A. Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1073-9.
Hofmeyer GJ. External cephalic version at term: How high are the stakes? Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;98:1-3.
Newman RB, Peacock BS, VanDorsten JP, Hunt HH. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:245-9.
Impey L, Lissoni D. Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks gestation without tocolysis. J Maternal-Fetal Med. 1999;8(5):203-7.
Hindawi I. Value and pregnancy outcome of external cephalic version. WHO Health J. 2005:11.
Myerscough P. The practice of external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;105:1043-5.
Nor Azlin HI, Haliza H, Mahdy ZA, Anson I, Fahya MN, Jamil MA. Tocolysis in term breech external cephalic version. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;88:5-8.
Stephen PY. Introducing external cephalic version in a Malaysian Setting. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13:40-5.
Arif W. Outcome of external cephalic version in terms of success rate and fetomaternal complications. ANNALS. 2010;16:64-8.
Healey M, Porter R, Galimberti A. Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;104:1073-9.
Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C. External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:783-6.