DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163862

Comparison of the efficacy of extra amniotic Foley catheter, intravaginal prostaglandin E1 tablet and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for pre induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparative study

Asha Jenkins, Sendhil Coumary A., Seetesh Ghose

Abstract


Background: To compare the efficacy, efficiency and safety of extra amniotic Foley catheter with intracervical PGE2 gel and intravaginal misoprostol tablet for pre induction cervical ripening. Design of the study was to prospective randomized comparative study. Settings includes, this study was conducted in Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry during November 2009 to May 2011.

Methods: Participants for pre induction cervical ripening were randomized to receive either extra amniotic Foley catheter, intravaginal misoprostol tablet 25µg every four hours or intracervical PGE2 gel 0.5mg every six hours. The post ripening Bishop Score at 12 hours and 24 hours were assessed. The outcome measured was the time taken by the participants to achieve Bishop Score >5. The other outcomes included induction ripening interval, induction delivery interval, mode of delivery, requirement of additional agents, maternal and fetal complications.

Results: The post ripening Bishop Score was significantly higher in PGE2 gel group with statistical significance. The induction ripening and the induction delivery interval was significantly shorter in misoprostol tablet group with a ‘p’ value <0.001. The incidence of NICU admission and other complications like meconium stained liquor, respiratory distress and maternal fever were more associated with misoprostol tablet group.

Conclusions: PGE2 gel is an efficient agent for pre induction cervical ripening when compared to Foley catheter and misoprostol tablet though it is expensive, unstable and requires refrigeration. Tablet misoprostol significantly reduces the ripening duration, ripening delivery interval and the total duration to delivery. Misoprostol tablet is inexpensive, stable at room temperature and easy to administer. It also reduces the need for oxytocin augmentation. However the safety of misoprostol is still a concern due to increased maternal and neonatal complications. Foley catheter alone is not a good cervical ripening agent.


Keywords


Cervical ripening, Foley catheter, Misoprostol tablet, PGE2 gel

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lenova C, Spong B, Hoffman D. Williams obstetrics. 24th edition, Mc Graw Hill; Physiology of labour. 2014:408-431.

Lenova C, Spong B, Hoffman D. Williams obstetrics. 24th edition, Mc Graw Hill; Induction and augmentation of labour. 2014:523-534.

Shivarudraiah G, Palaksha MA. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 2011:153-60.

Aqueela A, Shaukat S, Farooq MU, Khalid M, Iftikhar A, Muhammad LAB. Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;49:2.

Tabowei TO, Oboro VO. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening. East Afr Med J. 2003;80(2):91-4.

Roudsaria FV, Sedigheh A, Marzieh G, Maliheh HM, Shakerib MT. Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2011;10(1):149-54.

Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Kathryn A, Alec W, et al. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:25. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/13/25

Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Piotr C, Aleksandra S, Iwona S, Miroslaw W. Two methods of cervix ripening: intracervical Foley catether and dinoprostone- which one is actually more efficient? Neuroendocrinology Letters. 2015;36(3).

Niromanesh S, Mosavi-Jarrahi A, Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;81(1):23-7.

Tang OS, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC. Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99(2):S160-7.

Emer M. Smyth and Garret A. Fitzgerald. The eicosanoids: prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leucotrienes and related compounds. In Betram G. Katzung editor, Basic and clinical pharmacology, 11th edition Mc Graw Hill publishing; 2009.

Jane E. Norman. Induction of labour. In Brian A Magowan editor, clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd edition Saunders Elsevier publishing; 2014.