DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175017

To study the outcome of previous one cesarean pregnancies in a rural tertiary center of Haryana, India

Siwach S., Lakra P., Sangwan V., . Shivani, Kansal R., Mahendru R.

Abstract


Background: Rising rates of caesarean section is a matter of great concern and TOLAC is an attractive alternative. Analysing outcome of previous one caesarean pregnancies will provide an insight for reducing the caesarean rates and formulating protocols and policies for TOLAC.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients of previous one caesarean pregnancy was done from February 2015 to January 2016 and 3 groups were made, ERCS group, failed TOLAC group and successful TOLAC group. The rates of elective repeat caesarean, failed TOLAC, successful TOLAC, maternal complications, neonatal morbidity and mortality in all three groups were studied.

Results: There were 5177 total deliveries with 488 (9.43%) previous one caesarean pregnancies. Out of 488 patients 161 (33%) underwent elective repeat caesarean and 327 (67%) underwent trial of labour. Out of 327 patients 234 (71.56%) had a successful TOLAC and 93 (28.44%) had failed TOLAC. Breech (23%) followed by foetal distress (20%) were the most common indications of previous caesarean. Commonest indication of elective repeat caesarean was short interval (33%) and that of failed TOLAC was foetal distress (38.7%) followed by failed induction (23.6%). There were 4 morbidly adherent placentas (0.82%), 1 scar rupture, 3 scar dehiscence, no maternal mortality and 10 neonatal deaths.

Conclusions: Previous one caesarean section is not only a risk factor for repeat caesareans and complications like morbidly adherent placenta, uterine rupture but also a financial burden on health facilities. Encouraging the patients for trial of labour and emphasizing the usage of contraception is the need of the hour.


Keywords


Previous cesarean, TOLAC, VBAC

Full Text:

PDF

References


American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:203-12.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:450-63.

Key indicators for India from NFHS 2015-2016. Available at http://www.nfhsindia.org/factsheet.html Accessed on 10 July, 2017.

Health and social care information center. NHS Maternity Statistics - England, April 2012 to March 2013: Provider level analysis. [Leeds]: HSCIC. 2013. Available at http://www.hscic. gov.uk/catalogue/PUB12744 Accessed 2015 Mar 18.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births: Final data for 2015 national vital statistics report; Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017;66(1).

Deline J, Varnes-Epstein L, Dresang LT, Gideonsen M, Lynch L, Frey JJ. Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing centre. Ann Fam med. 2012;10(6):530-7.

Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 191 (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290- 2008-10057-I). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.

Jinturkar AA, Dongaonkar D. Study of obstetric and fetal outcome of post cesarean section pregnancy at tertiary care centre. Int J Recent Trends Sci Tech. 2014;10(3):530-7.

Doshi HU, Jain RK, Vazirani AA. Prognostic factors for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section - analysis of 162 cases. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2010;60(6):498-502.

Mishra N, Taori N, Misri A. Fetomaternal outcome of pregnancy with previous cesarean section. J Evolution Med and Dent Sci. 2014;3(47):11369-78.

Bangal VB, Giri PA, Shinde KK, Gavhane SP. Vaginal birth after cesarean. North Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(2):140-4.

Shah JM, Mehta MM. Analysis of mode of delivery in women with previous one cesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2007;59(2):136-9.

Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192.

Wise MR, Anderson NH, Sadler L. Ethnic disparities in repeat caesarean rates at Auckland Hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(5):443-50.

Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Inter delivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:175-80.

MacMohan MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of trial of labour with elective second cesarean. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:689-95.

Chhabra S, Arora G. Delivery in women with previous cesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56:304-7.

Shy L, Logerfo J, Karp L. Evaluation of elective repeat caesarean section as a standard of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139:123.

Royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Green top guideline No. 45. Birth after previous caesarean birth. 2007:1-31.